Umargam, Dist. Valsad from one Vithal Kambali on 23rd February, 1956. Mutation Entry No. 1411 was effected on 28th April, 1956. However, concerned authority made ... short "the Act"), therefore, the said mutation entry was required to be cancelled and accordingly it was cancelled on 7th August, 1957. This
suits, filed
written statements contending, inter alia, that the mutation entry of the
year 1916 showed Amarsi Gujjar as the holder of the land ... entries of 1916 and
consequently the entries of the year 1927 were extremely doubtful in view
of certain interpolations or overwritings in the said mutation
such entry was mutated
and as soon as the appellants - original
plaintiffs came to know about the mutation of
such entry, immediately they have challenged ... time, legal advice was
given to the appellants - original plaintiffs
that entries mutated in the revenue records are
nullity and void ab initio and, therefore
plaintiff and by misusing those documents
got effected the mutation entry no.496 dated 19 th August, 1984 in his exclusive
name in respect ... plaintiff and plaintiff had no knowledge about the said mutation entry
until 17th July, 2006. The plaintiff accordingly issued a notice to the defendants
through
respondent No.4 came to be mutated in
the revenue record on 8.1.1981 being the Mutation Entry
No.5370. The said entry came ... vide Entry
No.2242 and on the said basis Mutation Entry No.2210 dated
19.7.1996 came to be mutated in the revenue record.
(c) Thereafter
1986 passed
by Sub Divisional Officer, Ahmednagar, cancelling mutation entry
bearing no. 498 in respect of suit property and directing to mutate
name of Soneri ... suppressed
proceedings before the Divisional Commissioner, Nasik against
cancellation of mutation entry no.498 by Sub Divisional Officer
under order dated 16/10/1986. Cancellation
pass on title,
which he does not hold. Another mutation is
mutation
entry No.4 at Exhibit-36. This mutation
entry No.4 is relied ... dispute that there is no
such mutation in favour of the plaintiff. The
mutation entry only clarifies the reason for
mutating
name of a particular
Ranchhodbhai, Bhikhiben Ranchhodbhai,
Mahendrabhai Ranchhodbhai, Induben Ranchhodbhai were
mutated in the revenue records by Mutation Entry No.1520 on
Page 2 of 53
Downloaded ... plaintiffs and Taraben
wd/o. Mahendrabhai Ranchhodbhai were mutated in the revenue
records by mutation entry No.2557 on 12.06.1996 which came to
be certified
name of plaintiff no.1 was mutated in
the revenue records by Mutation Entry No.598 on 05.11.1990.
Thereafter, name of plaintiff ... Patel defendant no.4
and his name is mutated in the revenue record vide
mutation entry no.1283 dated 10.6.1981. Even considering
cause of action
their brothers.
2.1 Thereafter, on 30.7.1994, on account of family partition,
Mutation entry No. 2627 was made whereby the land
bearing Block No. 319 came ... name was
entered in the revenue record vide mutation entry No. 2826
which was confirmed by the Deputy Mamlatdar. Thereafter,
on 6.4.2000, Pravinchandra Dhayashankar Dave
