Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

besides the principal advanced, a sum of Rs. 57/14 as mutation fee, & Rs. 120 being the rent paid by them (the defts.) during

defendants no.1 & 2 to get the said suit property further mutated in their favour. Hence, plaintiff sent a legal notice ... despite receipt of said notice, defendant no.2 failed to cancel the mutation. Meanwhile plaintiff received a letter dt.02.08.2003 from defendant

Investigation/Acb vs ) Sri. B.S. Yeddyurappa on 26 October, 2016 IN THE COURT OF

post-trap proceedings. 17.4. Ex.P30 is the copy of mutation order and Ex.P31 is the copy of RTC extract ... mutation register. 20.3. During cross-examination Pw.1 in para-12 has specifically denied that he had deposited the required fee to collect

dated 25.01.2003 and this defendant has paid 27 OS.304/2004 conversion fees of Rs.1,67,544/- by virtue of the order passed ... defendant that plaintiffs were resorting to filing of certain applications for effecting mutation in their name in respect of entire Sy.No.112 of Kodigehalli

colly.). 5. Certified copy of conversion fees receipt is mark PW1/5. 6. Certified copy of mutation documents is mark

AGGARWAL Date: ­­Page 7 of 27­­ 2022.08.20 16:06:32 +0530 mutation of suit property on the basis of registered Will dated 29.06.82 is barred ... been properly valued for the purposes of Court fee and jurisdiction and appropriate Court fee has been affixed on the plaint?OPP. 4. Whether

plaintiff paid Rs. 65,000/- vide receipt No- 095099 dated 24.07.2012 for Mutation / Transfer charges of site in question and thereafter, subsequent nominal allotment ... stated that after mutation and change of allotment, the plaintiff has been regularly paying Teh Bazari Permit Fee vide various receipts, Receipt no-631341 dated

Singh. The Trial Court framed the following issues:- "1. Whether the mutation no.1313 dated 20.2.88 is illegal, null and void and not operative ... Whether the suit is not properly valued for purpose of court fee and jurisdiction. OPD 7. Whether the plaintiff is estopped from filing the present

execution of the Will dated 25th October, 1996 as also the mutation of the suit property in the name of the Plaintiffs. There ... suit has not been properly valued for the purpose of court fees and jurisdiction or requisite court fees have not been paid? OPD. 2. Whether