period of 20 years. Hence, the Revenue
Department has not passed mutation orders vide
M.R.No.5/1939-40. The contention of the respondents ... been acted upon by Revenue
Department and Revenue Department passed mutation
orders vide M.R.No.5/1939-40. The Respondents
period of 20 years. Hence, the Revenue
Department has not passed mutation orders vide
M.R.No.5/1939-40. The contention of the respondents ... been acted upon by Revenue
Department and Revenue Department passed mutation
orders vide M.R.No.5/1939-40. The Respondents
strength of the sale deed dated
16.08.1990. The Tahsildar passed mutation order in
M.R.No.15/2006-07 entering the name of the petitioner ... name of the petitioner in the land
records by virtue of mutation order passed in
M.R.No.15/2006-07. It is only thereafter
claimed that the municipal records were transferred to her
name by mutation order dated 07.05.1994 and her name was
entered in Katha utar ... Narasanagouda;
South: By remaining portion.
Ex.D2 is a mutation order in the name of defendant
concerning the property bearing
that he has
- 12 -
RFA No. 100225 of 2014
produced a mutation order, which discloses the prior
partition. Hence, the trial Court has committed ... that though, Ex.D.7 to
Ex.D.13 are the mutation orders. Further in the said
mutation orders there is a reference about
order
dated 21.04.2011 quashed the said letter dated 08.07.2008
and common order dated 29.01.2010 and directed respondent
No.4-Tahsildar to reconsider the order ... been confirmed by
the order of respondent No.3-Assistant Commissioner by an
order dated 29.11.2013. Pursuant to the orders of respondent
No.4-Tahsildar
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
QUASH THE MUTATION ORDER DATED 09.08.2017 VIDE
MR.NO.T26/2017-18 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND ETC.
THIS PETITION ... This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to quash
mutation order dated 09.08.2017 vide MR.No.T26/2017-18 vide
Annexure-J passed
order dated
21.04.2011 quashed the said letter dated 08.07.2008 and
common order dated 29.01.2010 and directed respondent
No.4-Tahsildar to reconsider the order ... been confirmed by
the order of respondent No.3-Assistant Commissioner by an
order dated 29.11.2013. Pursuant to the orders of respondent
No.4-Tahsildar
EXTENT OF 3 ACRES 20
GUNTAS IN TERMS OF THE MUTATION ORDER IN MR NO.H
19/2013-14 VIDE ANNEXURE-j.
THIS PETITION, COMING ... mutation register vide
MR No. H-19/2013-14 (Annexure-J to the Writ Petition).
That despite the mutation order the Respondent -Tahsildar
has omitted
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
MUTATION ORDER DATED 26.08.2017 VIDE MR NUMBER T-26 AND
MR NO.T30 DATED 29.08.2017 IN RESPECT ... certiorari or any other order in the
like nature quashing the mutation order dated
26.08.2017 vide MR number
