mutated in the name of
Hindu Ahir father of plaintiff vide Mutation Succession Case No. 13
R2/60-61 and the mutation so allowed ... title and possession had filed rent
receipt without proof of any mutation order by competent authority.
The learned trial court recorded that the defendants were
application for mutation and also claimed
mutation in their name, but the Circle Officer, Chandil did not
consider their prayer and allowed mutation in favour ... order in the light of the documents of the
plaintiffs. Thereafter, a fresh order was passed by the Circle Officer,
Chandil and the mutation
application for mutation and also claimed
mutation in their name, but the Circle Officer, Chandil did not
consider their prayer and allowed mutation in favour ... order in the light of the documents of the
plaintiffs. Thereafter, a fresh order was passed by the Circle Officer,
Chandil and the mutation
application for mutation and also claimed
mutation in their name, but the Circle Officer, Chandil did not
consider their prayer and allowed mutation in favour ... order in the light of the documents of the
plaintiffs. Thereafter, a fresh order was passed by the Circle Officer,
Chandil and the mutation
application for mutation and also claimed
mutation in their name, but the Circle Officer, Chandil did not
consider their prayer and allowed mutation in favour ... order in the light of the documents of the
plaintiffs. Thereafter, a fresh order was passed by the Circle Officer,
Chandil and the mutation
original writ petitioner. The original writ petitioner also claimed that
mutation orders were passed in his favour. The following issues were
framed by the learned ... also
subsequent Mutation Case No. 236(ix) of 77-78 and the correction
slip dated 19.09.78 (Annexure-11), but the said mutation order
thirteen year. O.P. has not filed the copy
of the mutation order and he has also not explained why the land was
not mutated ... submit that
they are primarily relating to different mutation orders in favour of
appellant no. 3. He submits that all the mutation orders were passed
plaintiffs had applied for mutation which was numbered as
mutation case no. 47-R-27 of 1987-88 and the mutation was partly
allowed ... only to the extent of 90½ decimals vide order dated
28.03.1988 (exhibit-6). The order of mutation became final and
ultimately, the suit was filed
mutated in the
serista of the State of Bihar now Jharkhand vide Mutation Case
7
( 2025:JHHC:17164 )
No.1234(III)/2000-01 and Mutation ... name mutated
for 13 Chhatak of land vide Mutation Case
No.2012(III)/2006-07. Certified copy of mutation order
applied for mutation which
was numbered as Mutation Case No.886 of 2008-2009. The
application for mutation was rejected vide order dated ... dated 28.08.2015 passed in Mutation
Appeal No.8 of 2014-2015. The mutation revision was heard and
dismissed vide order dated 02.03.2017 by the Additional
