defendant in respect of the suit lands. The
Tahsildar, Amangalimplemented the order and mutated the name of the
defendant in the Record of Rights ... Order XLI Rule 27 of CPC vide I.A.No.1 of 2023. The other exhibits filed by
the appellants - defendants would show the mutation
defendant in respect of the suit lands. The
Tahsildar, Amangalimplemented the order and mutated the name of the
defendant in the Record of Rights ... Order XLI Rule 27 of CPC vide I.A.No.1 of 2023. The other exhibits filed by
the appellants - defendants would show the mutation
abatement order. The lower court
failed to see that the delay was not 100 days, but it was more than 6 years. In
order ... Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella, when the claimants
challenged the mutation orders of the Mandal Revenue Officer vide order
No.C/3595/2007, dated
abatement order. The lower court
failed to see that the delay was not 100 days, but it was more than 6 years. In
order ... Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella, when the claimants
challenged the mutation orders of the Mandal Revenue Officer vide order
No.C/3595/2007, dated
abatement order. The lower court
failed to see that the delay was not 100 days, but it was more than 6 years. In
order ... Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella, when the claimants
challenged the mutation orders of the Mandal Revenue Officer vide order
No.C/3595/2007, dated
abatement order. The lower court
failed to see that the delay was not 100 days, but it was more than 6 years. In
order ... Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella, when the claimants
challenged the mutation orders of the Mandal Revenue Officer vide order
No.C/3595/2007, dated
abatement order. The lower court
failed to see that the delay was not 100 days, but it was more than 6 years. In
order ... Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella, when the claimants
challenged the mutation orders of the Mandal Revenue Officer vide order
No.C/3595/2007, dated
abatement order. The lower court
failed to see that the delay was not 100 days, but it was more than 6 years. In
order ... Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella, when the claimants
challenged the mutation orders of the Mandal Revenue Officer vide order
No.C/3595/2007, dated
abatement order. The lower court
failed to see that the delay was not 100 days, but it was more than 6 years. In
order ... Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella, when the claimants
challenged the mutation orders of the Mandal Revenue Officer vide order
No.C/3595/2007, dated
abatement order. The lower court
failed to see that the delay was not 100 days, but it was more than 6 years. In
order ... Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella, when the claimants
challenged the mutation orders of the Mandal Revenue Officer vide order
No.C/3595/2007, dated
