order dated 17.06.2021 passed by the respondent No.2 be
quashed.
(iii) Appropriate writ direction or order in the nature of mandamus, the
mutation entry ... impugned
orders be quashed.
(iv) Appropriate writ direction or order in the nature of mandamus, the
respondents be directed not to make any mutation
filed seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent
no.1 vide order dated 3/12/2019 passed in M.Cr.C. No.46997/2019 ... suppression and
misrepresentation of facts. It is submitted that the alleged mutation
order dated 28/4/2014 is based on the Will of late Chimman
there is a provision that the
Tahsildar shall pass orders relating to mutation within thirty days of registration of
case, in case of undisputed matter ... Court and only then Will will be a document of mutation in terms of
Mutation Rules of 2018 and not before that. Thus
there is a provision that the
Tahsildar shall pass orders relating to mutation within thirty days of registration of
case, in case of undisputed matter ... Court and only then Will will be a document of mutation in terms of
Mutation Rules of 2018 and not before that. Thus
there is a provision that the
Tahsildar shall pass orders relating to mutation within thirty days of registration of
case, in case of undisputed matter ... Court and only then Will will be a document of mutation in terms of
Mutation Rules of 2018 and not before that. Thus
there is a provision that the
Tahsildar shall pass orders relating to mutation within thirty days of registration of
case, in case of undisputed matter ... Court and only then Will will be a document of mutation in terms of
Mutation Rules of 2018 and not before that. Thus
there is a provision that the
Tahsildar shall pass orders relating to mutation within thirty days of registration of
case, in case of undisputed matter ... Court and only then Will will be a document of mutation in terms of
Mutation Rules of 2018 and not before that. Thus
panchnama was duly prepared in that
regard.
(xv) Tehsildar passed an order for mutation and recording the
name of Indore Municipal Corporation in the revenue ... Sewage Treatment Plant. Upon possession, on
05.12.2009, the Tehsildar passed an order of mutation and recorded
the name of appellant in the revenue records
mutation. Surprisingly, vide order dated 28.07.2020 the
Respondent No.1 recalled its own order dated 25.07.2020, meaning
thereby, the mutation of the petitioner was restored ... civil suit seeking
declaration of title when the mutation was canceled. He further contended
that several orders have been challenged in one writ petition with
recognizing such
ownership rights by the order passed by the competent authority.
Thereafter, their names were duly mutated in the revenue records in
the year ... Authorities of the
respondents as is evident from the Khasra records, mutation order,
ordersheets in the earlier ceiling proceedings and the affidavit
furnished by Devakrishna
