biswa was mutated in favour of Smt. Sita Singh on
15.10.1965 in the revenue record. The said sale deed and mutation order
dated ... which the land in
question was mutated in favour of Smt. Sita Singh and also challenged
the mutation order dated 25.08.2003 by which the land
favour of the
plaintiffs, defendant no.1 to 4 declaring the Mutation order ... suit is for decree of declaration :
"Firstly that the mutation order dated 18.11.1996 is null
and void; and
Secondly that the defendant
filed by IP No.3 Sh. Sukhbir Singh
against the mutation order dated 19.07.1979 along with one
Smt. Brahmo. Thereafter, a revision petition was filed ... vide order
dated 14.07.1987. Another civil suit was filed against the
mutation order dated 19.07.1979, which was highly time
barred and civil court
order of 1973, issued by the Government under Government Order No. 453 of 1973, it was directed that no mutation under the Government Order ... Government Order No. LB-6/C of 1958 of all its legal imports. The order of 1973 banning attestation of the mutations under Government Order
aside the order passed by the Circle
Officer, Phulwarisharif in ordering for mutation in favour of the
petitioners.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits ... which is the basis of the mutation case) was prayed for.
15. As such, the said mutation order was passed in
violation of Section
interfere with the impugned orders. Hence the appeals are rejected and impugned orders are upheld with the directions that the order under appeal applies ... impugned order of the learned Financial Commissioner is a fit order to be interfered with by the revisional authority. The order cannot be allowed
name of
Narsimmaiah S/o Nanjudappa as per mutation
order MR No.4/73-74 for an extent of 4 Acre 0.29
Guntas ... 2017 C/w L.A.C. No. 45/2022
mutation order viz., MR No.26/1996-97. The
authority allowed the appeal by an order
name of
Narsimmaiah S/o Nanjudappa as per mutation
order MR No.4/73-74 for an extent of 4 Acre 0.29
Guntas ... 2017 C/w L.A.C. No. 45/2022
mutation order viz., MR No.26/1996-97. The
authority allowed the appeal by an order
sites formed in Sy. No. 18/3. Ex. P 82 is Mutation Order
No. 2/1989 - 90 under which the revenue records of 1
acre ... 8209/2005
Common Judgement
KABC0A0042232005 KABC0A0038082004
mutation order in respect of entire extent of survey No.
18/3 being changed the name of M. Sanjeevappa
9914/19 Baljeet Singh vs Iqbal Singh 8/38
mutation order dated 18.10.1965 is clearly mentioned. Therefore, after 43
years of execution and registration ... also concealed the mutation in
favour of Sita Singh on 15.10.1965 in the revenue records. The sale deed
and mutation order were never challenged
