Settlement Officer by order, dated 4.10.2002, upholding
the order of the Assistant Settlement Officer.
27. Being dissatisfied with the order of the Settlement
Officer, respondent ... obtaining fraudulent mutation in the year 1993
cannot claim ownership over the land on the basis of the said
mutation order in Mutation case
Copy of the mutation file no. 1401 : Ex. DW1/1
c) Certified copy of mutation order ... Copy of the Mutation file no. 1404 : Ex. DW1/3
e) Copy of mutation order 1404 : Ex. DW1/4
f) Copy of Masawai
Kashmir,
Srinagar, against mutation order no.51 as well as against order of
Collector, SDM, which was allowed vide order dated 4 th October ... attestation of mutation only in her brother's name.
These statements, according to respondent no.2, were recorded in
mutation order. It is next
rest of the Estate was mutated in the name of present petitioners.
This Mutation order was challenged in Appeal which was
dismissed by the Appellate ... These orders are called in
question in this petition.
Mr. Arshid Andrabi learned counsel for the petitioners
submitted that the orders on Mutation passed
Court while passing the order in Civil revision dated
25.10.1982. The said order passed by the Director
Consolidation and the order passed ... that even if the orders have been upheld by the High Court
by a non-speaking order, such an order will not operate
aside the revenue entries by
3
virtue of the Mutation Order MR 21/2010-2011 dated :
6.7.2011 and also granted permanent injunction
restraining the defendant ... number
and the mutation was also effected in the name of the
plaintiff. Ex.P-4 is the copy of mutation order
opinion that the mutation proceedings" were ' judicial proceedings" and that the mutation- officer, by his order 'mutation according to compromise ... Revenue Court. She in her plaint sued to have the mutation order set aside on the ground of fraud. But the Courts have held that
knowledge of the
sale deeds dated 2nd November, 1987 or the mutation order dated 21st
November, 1988 as no notice was served to the plaintiffs ... knowledge of sale deeds dated 2nd November, 1987 or the
mutation order dated 9th September, 1988 as no notice was served on the
plaintiffs/respondents
defendants/respondents are Chitha map and copy of the Chitha mutation order passed by the revenue authority which discloses that the names of the both ... whose favour mutation is ordered to pay the land revenue in question....
14. Such an order affecting mutation in favour of a person prima facie
this backdrop that she had made an application for cancelling the mutation order in the Nazul Department. However, the same was rejected and thereafter ... name of the defendant mutated. An application was also made by the plaintiff for seeking the recall of the mutation order, however, the same
