submitted that the Deputy Commissioner had passed
the order dated 06.01.2004 (Annexure P-7) ordering the mutation in favour
of the petitioner. FAO aforementioned ... aforementioned facts, i.e., the
orders passed by this Court and as well as revenue Court orders ordering the
mutation of the properties of Dera
bearing No.173 dated 25.11.1981
8. Ex.P9 order dated 13.10.1982 whereby the
mutation was disputed.
9. Ex.P10 Order dated 21.05.1983 passed ... record that plaintiffs were totally oblivious of the
order of the Collector and the mutation no.2136, much less, rapat
roznamcha and despite that
this regard, counsel for the plaintiffs while closing the
For Subsequent orders see RA-CR-66-CII-2018
3 of 6
::: Downloaded ... Jamabandis Exs.PX/1 to Ex.PX4, certified copy of Mutation
order Ex.PX/5, certified copy of application os Ex.PX/6,
certified
impugned
order, the plaintiff immediately filed an appeal against the aforementioned
order which was stayed by the SDO, vide order dated 17.03.1999. Even FIR
bearing ... explanation has come forth of appeal having laid
against the order of cancellation of mutation. The Deputy Commissioner,
Sirsa, had marked the inquiry
whereas the partition proceedings were already complete vide
order dated 09.06.1994 and mutation bearing No.259 was also passed before
the decree ... denied by the
counsel for the defendants, much less, mutation (Ex.D-2). By ordering the
separate shares of co-sharers, the right
revenue limits of village Gaunsgarh. As per orders of the Additional
Director Consolidation dated 18.12.1959, the mutation in respect of said
land was entered ... Court failed to reconcile the entries
between the order of Assistant Director, Consolidation and the mutations as
the whole idea of the consolidation
Court and
concealed the real facts that mutation No.5150 in terms of
order dated 25.07.1967 of Sh. Mela Singh Consolidation
Officer was sanctioned vide ... Court by placing on record Annexure A-2, mutation dated
29.05.1978 and Annexure A-3, order dated 22.04.1966 passed
mutation of inheritance was sanctioned in favour of Bhagwan Dass vide
mutation No.383 dated 11.1.1995. However, Mutation No.413 was
implemented by the order ... mutation No.275 is illegal, null and void? OPD
9. Whether the disputed property was secular property and it
is not religious one by mutation
plaintiff filed an
appeal against the order dated 11.07.2007 before SDM Dasuya which was
dismissed, vide order dated 04.12.2008.
The aforementioned suit was contested ... year 2004-05
Ex.P6 copy of mutation no.727
Ex.P7 copy of order dated 4.12.2008
Ex.P8 copy of order
suit by taking the objections of
maintainability, barred by Order 2 Rule 2 CPC , Order 23 Rule 1(4) CPC
and for setting ... appellants-plaintiff in challenging the
order dated 10.3.1993 (Ex.D8) resulting into passing the mutation was
within a period of limitation" and secondly
