further alleged that mutation in favour of ineligible persons was
carried out by the applicant/Tehsildar and mutation orders were
accordingly passed. This ... This was
done in order to deprive her from joining at Churhat and in order to
frustrate the interim order passed by this Court. During
Parvati Devi, wife of Shiv Nath (applicant no.1). During consolidation, mutation order was also passed. An application was moved on behalf of applicants side ... opposite party no.2. They moved application for mutation and during consolidation mutation order was passed. At this juncture, learned Senior Counsel specifically referred
biswa was mutated in favour of Smt. Sita Singh on
15.10.1965 in the revenue record. The said sale deed and mutation order
dated ... which the land in
question was mutated in favour of Smt. Sita Singh and also challenged
the mutation order dated 25.08.2003 by which the land
case is that pursuant to the order of remand dated 11.10.1993, no further orders deciding the mutation case were passed by the Tehsildar, as those ... order dated 10.08.1992, in some form, despite the order being set aside with a remand, is manifestly illegal. Once an order of mutation
Challenge in the writ petition is to the order dated 21.08.2019. By this order, a mutation order dated 26.11.2018 in favour of the petitioner ... January 2019. The Tehsildar, by his order dated 28 January 2019, stayed the operation of the order of mutation dated 26 November 2018 and directed
been passed regarding plot no.298. Mutation was never claimed over plot no.298. The mutation order is therefore, illegal and cannot be sustained.
With ... dated 07.10.2017, was a necessary party to the mutation case filed by the petitioner. The mutation order had been passed without any notice or information
lapse of 19 years
complainant Dhannalal, out of greed challenged the mutation order dated
17.5.1995 (Annexure-D-4) before the SDO Gadarwara on 25.2.2014 which ... mutated his name in the revenue record. Mutation of any person
recorded after inviting the objection on the mutation and after that revenue
Officer mutated
basic year for the first round of chakbandi, there were three mutation orders recorded. The first was a mutation under orders of the Sub Divisional ... mutated out and on the basis of inheritance, the name of Ram Lakhan was entered. The second and the third mutation orders were those
proceedings ordered to abate.
Under the circumstances, the petitioner filed a recall application on 28.10.2002 for recall of the order abating the mutation case ... mutation case has been ordered to abate vide order dated 28.10.2002 on the ground that the mutation order had been fraudulently obtained during the currency
order dated 25.10.2012. Subsequently, an application for recall of the said order dated 25.10.2012 was moved which was also rejected by means of the order ... order dated 21.07.2016 that the application for restoration/recall was allowed and order was set aside but it was only the subsequent order by which
