orders passed in the said proceedings are always subject to adjudication by the competent court and therefore a writ petition against an order in mutation ... follows :-
(i) mutation proceedings are summary in nature wherein title of the parties over the land involved is not decided;
(ii) mutation order or revenue
orders passed in the said proceedings are always subject to adjudication by the competent court and therefore a writ petition against an order in mutation ... follows :-
(i) mutation proceedings are summary in nature wherein title of the parties over the land involved is not decided;
(ii) mutation order or revenue
order is bad and cannot be sustained.
18. The second limb of submission of Shri Shukla is that an order of mutation passed under Section ... regarding the effect of the order dated 07.05.1970 passed by the Consolidation Officer while passing the order of mutation dated 28.10.1977 in favour
Respondent No.1 - plaintiff filed a suit for
declaration questioning the mutation order passed by
6
the 6th respondent - Town Municipal Council and
consequently, sought ... appearing for the appellants - defendants
would contend that the suit challenging mutation
order is not at all maintainable and the said issue
declaration of the proceedings and mutation to be
null and void and also for setting aside the mutation order. The title of the
respondent ... date of
final order of mutation proceedings have been reflected from the application. Even
otherwise, the mutation order passed by the competent authority is required
JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL)
[1] The Assistant Survey and Settlement Officer, Imphal West-I, passed
order dated 27.12.2005 in Mutation Case ... obtained mutation, asserting absolute rights.
[12] Though Annie Mangsatabam claimed that her brothers had knowledge of
the mutation order and that they were liable
2018 1|Page
Judge challenging order dated 31.12.2014 passed by respondent No.3
herein whereby orders passed on mutation Nos.383 and 608 of Estate ... Commissioner, Revenue, the
said order had already been implemented by the Tehsildar concerned
by passing a fresh order of mutation on 13/15-01/2015
CPOWP no.230/2018
authorities for correcting revenue entries, and accordingly, Mutation
Order no. 138 dated 1st April 1982 and Mutation Order no. 143 dated ... mutations. According to learned counsel
for petitioner, respondent no.5 concealed the fact of having already
filed an appeal against mutation order
matter after the mutation proceedings have become
final and conclusive with the dismissal of the appeals against the
mutation orders with no further challenge. Secondly ... challenge to the mutation orders No. 164
and 165 aforesaid. In this view of the matter, the orders of mutation
attained finality and became final
penalty order was under challenge. One
of the grounds on which the order of penalty was
challenged was that an exercise of mutation carried ... adducing evidence. For the
Garmajurwa Malik land, petitioner passed
mutation order on the basis of running name of
Chandan Sao and Bharat Sao. The name
