order dated 11.05.2022 passed by the Tehsildar, Ambedkar Nagar, order dated 27.03.2024 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Aalapur, District Ambedkar Nagar and order dated ... follows :-
(i) mutation proceedings are summary in nature wherein title of the parties over the land involved is not decided;
(ii) mutation order or revenue
pertains to mutation No. 97 dated 16.05.2002, mutation No. 98 dated
16.05.2002, and mutation No. 105 dated 10.10.2004.
57.The aforementioned mutations were initially documented ... order, as it contests only a derivative
order issued by the Tehsildar of Jammu, which references the
Collector's order.
59.The order challenged
pertains to mutation No. 97 dated 16.05.2002, mutation No. 98 dated
16.05.2002, and mutation No. 105 dated 10.10.2004.
57.The aforementioned mutations were initially documented ... order, as it contests only a derivative
order issued by the Tehsildar of Jammu, which references the
Collector's order.
59.The order challenged
present at the time of attestation of mutations
and he has appended his signatures on the mutation orders.
Even the father of the petitioner Dina ... time of attestation of mutation No. 225 dated 17.12.1981 and
his signatures are also appearing on the mutation order. It is
correct that Sh. Parmanand
present at the time of attestation of mutations
and he has appended his signatures on the mutation orders.
Even the father of the petitioner Dina ... time of attestation of mutation No. 225 dated 17.12.1981 and
his signatures are also appearing on the mutation order. It is
correct that Sh. Parmanand
present at the time of attestation of mutations
and he has appended his signatures on the mutation orders.
Even the father of the petitioner Dina ... time of attestation of mutation No. 225 dated 17.12.1981 and
his signatures are also appearing on the mutation order. It is
correct that Sh. Parmanand
present at the time of attestation of mutations
and he has appended his signatures on the mutation orders.
Even the father of the petitioner Dina ... time of attestation of mutation No. 225 dated 17.12.1981 and
his signatures are also appearing on the mutation order. It is
correct that Sh. Parmanand
order was passed and date was fixed as 23.4.1999 and on the said date also, no order was passed on the order sheet. The order ... order was passed and date was fixed as 23.4.1999 and on the said date also, no order was passed on the order sheet. The order
basis of the will dated 23.12.1993 and a favourable
Mutation Order was passed on 27.09.1994 by the Tehsildar,
Harraiya.
3
3.5 As the complainant-respondent ... order of the trial court, the
respondent filed objections against the Mutation Order dated
27.09.1994 along with an application seeking the recall of the
same
mutated in the name of
Hindu Ahir father of plaintiff vide Mutation Succession Case No. 13
R2/60-61 and the mutation so allowed ... title and possession had filed rent
receipt without proof of any mutation order by competent authority.
The learned trial court recorded that the defendants were
