orders passed in the said proceedings are always subject to adjudication by the competent court and therefore a writ petition against an order in mutation ... follows :-
(i) mutation proceedings are summary in nature wherein title of the parties over the land involved is not decided;
(ii) mutation order or revenue
Parvati Devi, wife of Shiv Nath (applicant no.1). During consolidation, mutation order was also passed. An application was moved on behalf of applicants side ... opposite party no.2. They moved application for mutation and during consolidation mutation order was passed. At this juncture, learned Senior Counsel specifically referred
patta executed in their favour. The aforesaid order was a common order, ordering mutation in favour of the different applicants for mutation, relatives ... said order and they accepted in evidence a true copy of that order, without asking for a certified copy.
A perusal of the order
that a mutation order does not decide any right, title or interest of any party finally and thus an order of mutation being an outcome ... mutation order is concerned, as noticed above, it is only an order in summary proceedings and would be subject to the orders passed
orders passed in the said proceedings are always subject to adjudication by the competent court and therefore a writ petition against an order in mutation ... follows :-
(i) mutation proceedings are summary in nature wherein title of the parties over the land involved is not decided;
(ii) mutation order or revenue
order dated 11.05.2022 passed by the Tehsildar, Ambedkar Nagar, order dated 27.03.2024 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Aalapur, District Ambedkar Nagar and order dated ... follows :-
(i) mutation proceedings are summary in nature wherein title of the parties over the land involved is not decided;
(ii) mutation order or revenue
order is bad and cannot be sustained.
18. The second limb of submission of Shri Shukla is that an order of mutation passed under Section ... regarding the effect of the order dated 07.05.1970 passed by the Consolidation Officer while passing the order of mutation dated 28.10.1977 in favour
order was passed and date was fixed as 23.4.1999 and on the said date also, no order was passed on the order sheet. The order ... order was passed and date was fixed as 23.4.1999 and on the said date also, no order was passed on the order sheet. The order
case is that pursuant to the order of remand dated 11.10.1993, no further orders deciding the mutation case were passed by the Tehsildar, as those ... order dated 10.08.1992, in some form, despite the order being set aside with a remand, is manifestly illegal. Once an order of mutation
patta executed in his favour. The aforesaid order was a common order, ordering mutation in favour of the different applicants for mutation, relatives ... possible to mutate the petitioner's name over the land in dispute, on the strength of the mutation order. It has then been observed
