impugned order has been passed contrary to the provisions enshrined in Section 50 of the Act. In the impugned order mutation has also been sanctioned ... impugned order is void and does not deserve any merit. Consequently, I accept the appeal, set aside the impugned order and sanction mutation in favor
under Section 64 of the Delhi Land
Revenue Act, 1954 against mutation order of 23rd February, 1958 passed
by the concerned Tehsildar, is assailed ... Voidable' orders in Babu Ram (Supra), I find no palpable error in
the impugned order holding that the mutation of the year
Khanna, C.J.
(1) The question as to whether a mutation order incorporating a compromise between the parties as an instrument for the purpose ... case the compromise is incorporated in a record of mutation proceedings. The mutation order recording a compromise between the parties and directing entries in revenue
order passed by the Collector, North-West District, Delhi and that passed by the Financial Commissioner in appeal, whereby an order attesting a mutation ... also appear to have been passed. In so far as the mutation order passed by the Naib Tehsildar was concerned, respondents 4 to 9 preferred
Khazan Singh mutated in their names
in the revenue record vide mutation serial no. 457 dated 20.5.1996 and which
order was illegal. It was then ... defendants, however,
mutation does not confer any title, and I am taking the present suit as not for
cancelling of the mutation order in favour
consequential order of mutation dated
13.1.98 based on the above will sanctioned by the Tehsildar
vide Mutation order no.3025 in favour of the defendants ... reliefs as prayed in the plaint is for cancellation of the mutation order of
the authorities dated 13.1.1998 on the basis of which lands
Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954, instead of setting aside the mutation
order (Annexure P-4). While relying upon the decision in 'Rajni Tandon ... concerned Tehsildar when dispute regarding
mutation is raised and the higher authorities have to necessarily set aside
the mutation order which ignores the dispute
that
the appellant/plaintiff seeks the relief of cancellation of the mutation
order by the revenue authorities in favour of defendant no. 2, and such ... appellant/plaintiff.
The consequential reliefs of injunction and cancellation of the
mutation order of the suit land by the revenue authorities in favour
Minutes of sub-division of property dated
14.1.1990; and
(vi) A Mutation order dated 24.1.1994.
7. The letter of request dated 20.8.1992 referred ... formal order issued communicating the
order sanctioning mutation dated 24.1.1994.
8. Ex.PW-1/3 is a site plan evidencing a partition of
the property
HVOC. This
order was also assailed by the Amritsar Sugar Mills Company
Limited by an appeal before the Collector. The order of mutation ... HVOC challenged the
order passed by the collector before the commissioner who vide
order dated 18th December, 2001, sanctioned mutation no.3971 in
favour
