orders passed in the said proceedings are always subject to adjudication by the competent court and therefore a writ petition against an order in mutation ... follows :-
(i) mutation proceedings are summary in nature wherein title of the parties over the land involved is not decided;
(ii) mutation order or revenue
further alleged that mutation in favour of ineligible persons was
carried out by the applicant/Tehsildar and mutation orders were
accordingly passed. This ... This was
done in order to deprive her from joining at Churhat and in order to
frustrate the interim order passed by this Court. During
mutation till February, 1992 and that no notice of attestation of mutation was ever sent to her. The mutation order, copy of which ... from the mother of the plaintiff, was mutated in its name. It is mentioned in the mutation order that permission had been granted
mutation under Section 5 of the Act attested in his
favour on 28th Jeth Svt. 2008 (1951 A.D.).
6. The reversionaries questioned mutation order ... Shri Ghasitu Ram, his grandson
7
(legatee) and reversionaries finally made mutation order
no. 4192 under Section 4 of J&K Agrarian Reforms
impugned order has been passed contrary to the provisions enshrined in Section 50 of the Act. In the impugned order mutation has also been sanctioned ... impugned order is void and does not deserve any merit. Consequently, I accept the appeal, set aside the impugned order and sanction mutation in favor
under Section 64 of the Delhi Land
Revenue Act, 1954 against mutation order of 23rd February, 1958 passed
by the concerned Tehsildar, is assailed ... Voidable' orders in Babu Ram (Supra), I find no palpable error in
the impugned order holding that the mutation of the year
Settlement Officer by order, dated 4.10.2002, upholding
the order of the Assistant Settlement Officer.
27. Being dissatisfied with the order of the Settlement
Officer, respondent ... obtaining fraudulent mutation in the year 1993
cannot claim ownership over the land on the basis of the said
mutation order in Mutation case
Land Acquisition Act, the appellants produced copies of mutation orders, Exhibits P-l to P-5. Ex-
hibit P. 1 is a copy of mutation ... dated August 12, 1959, Exhibit p. 2 is a copy of mutation order No. 363 attested on December 9, 1957, pertaining to the sale
biswa was mutated in favour of Smt. Sita Singh on
15.10.1965 in the revenue record. The said sale deed and mutation order
dated ... which the land in
question was mutated in favour of Smt. Sita Singh and also challenged
the mutation order dated 25.08.2003 by which the land
mutated the land and it is alleged that excess mutation of 3.27 decimal has
been made. He submitted that thus, excess mutation of 7.21 decimal ... name of different purchasers
belong to the said plot 24 mutation order has been issued by Ratu, Nagri,
Circle Officer which is disclosed
