further alleged that mutation in favour of ineligible persons was
carried out by the applicant/Tehsildar and mutation orders were
accordingly passed. This ... This was
done in order to deprive her from joining at Churhat and in order to
frustrate the interim order passed by this Court. During
mutation order and ultimately vide impugned order
(Ann.P.5) such earlier order dated 16.4.2007 (Ann. P.2) was set aside and
the order ... aside the
impugned order and restore the earlier order of the Board of Revenue
affirming the order of mutation passed by the Nazul Officer
declaration of the proceedings and mutation to be
null and void and also for setting aside the mutation order. The title of the
respondent ... date of
final order of mutation proceedings have been reflected from the application. Even
otherwise, the mutation order passed by the competent authority is required
time the order for report
from Patwari was passed, received, verified, seen and final order was also passed.
And the order of mutation was also ... Bohra was alive at the time of mutation, and they have
never opposed the mutation order.
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: REENA PARTHO
SARKAR
Signing
order dated 29.05.2023 by order dated 16.10.2023. However, upon final
hearing, the Commissioner, by order dated 26.12.2023, dismissed the appeal
and affirmed the order passed ... petitioners clarifies that the
order dated 04.10.2023 is not an order passed in review on merits, but merely
an order declining permission to file
into knowledge after passing of
the order of mutation, requires consideration and therefore, the mutation
order has been set aside. Liberty was granted ... nobody
objected the claim of the petitioner seeking mutation on the basis of
inheritance, the mutation order dated 15.07.2010 was passed.
13.Even
then, Collector set aside that mutation order vide
order dated 24/03/1986. Thereafter, the land was again mutated in the names
of complainant Munnalal ... mutation of the said
land on their names, on which he got notice published and thereafter as per
Rule passed the mutation order in favour
original
plaintiffs as mentioned above in the order and the petitioners
have filed the orders of mutation in the writ petition. It means
that ... authorities i.e. order dated 07.06.2012 passed by the Sub-
divisional Officer, order dated 19.06.2013 passed by the Upper
Collector, order dated 24.02.2015 passed
lapse of 19 years
complainant Dhannalal, out of greed challenged the mutation order dated
17.5.1995 (Annexure-D-4) before the SDO Gadarwara on 25.2.2014 which ... mutated his name in the revenue record. Mutation of any person
recorded after inviting the objection on the mutation and after that revenue
Officer mutated
this petition. Suffice it to
say that on consent basis the mutation orders were passed by
the Revenue Inspector ... order to hold that on the
basis of any valid conveyance deed in favour of respondents 2 to
9, the consent order of mutation
