whereby,
in an appeal filed by respondent No.3 against the Mutation order No. 177
dated 14.08.1986 and Mutation order No.258 dated 27.03.20, respondent ... 2019
2 It is the case of the petitioner that Mutation order No. 177 dated
14.08.1986 under Section 4 of Agrarian Reforms
Vide its
order dated 31.10.2017, respondent No.1, while upholding the order
regarding setting aside of aforesaid mutation orders, dismissed the revision
petition ... while passing the impugned order, has failed to notice that in the
order dated 20.08.1989 whereunder the Mutating Officer has attested the
mutation under Section
adducing
evidence. For the Garmajurwa Malik land, petitioner
passed mutation order on the basis of running name of
Chandan Sao and Bharat Sao. The name ... that the petitioner has
followed all the statutory procedures for passing mutation
order before the petitioner was not entitle to empower
14
transfer of land
petitioner No.2. On the basis of
said gift deed, the mutation order was passed in favour of petitioner
No.2 and, accordingly, the revenue ... mutated in the
revenue records.
4. After the mutation, the petitioner No.2 filed an application for
Batankan and by order dated 10.1.2005 Batankan
know that an
8
O S No.10287/2015
order of mutation order was passed by the Tahasildar
without their notice . The plaintiffs have challenged ... revenue records were mutated
into the name of defendant No.2 H.A.Somashekar as
per the mutation order marked at Ex.D-6. Based
Court while passing the order in Civil revision dated
25.10.1982. The said order passed by the Director
Consolidation and the order passed ... that even if the orders have been upheld by the High Court
by a non-speaking order, such an order will not operate
assailing the order dated 25.01.2021, whereby the revision filed against the mutation order dated 19.12.2018 has been dismissed.
It is contended by learned counsel ... that:
(i) mutation proceedings are summary in nature wherein title of the parties over the land involved is not decided;
(ii) mutation order or revenue
view of this order of
remand, the order of status quo granted by this Court
earlier on 23.07.2013 shall continue till orders are passed ... writ petition).
Accordingly, the 5th respondent passed orders in File
No.B/371/2008, dated 30.01.2010 ordering mutation in
17
the name of the appellant
view of this order of
remand, the order of status quo granted by this Court
earlier on 23.07.2013 shall continue till orders are passed ... writ petition).
Accordingly, the 5th respondent passed orders in File
No.B/371/2008, dated 30.01.2010 ordering mutation in
17
the name of the appellant
order dated 03.03.2021.
13. The order dated 03.03.2021 suffered from some typographical error and therefore, it was corrected by the order dated 19.03.2021.
14. This ... nature and if an order is passed in such proceedings or any writ petition thereafter challenging such orders passed in mutation proceedings, in favour
