correct. No sale deeds were executed; and it appears from
the mutations that the defendants merely purported to transfer
their interest in these plots ... column of proprietorship according to the rules
governing mutation proceedings. Moreover, the defendants
have made it clear in their written statements also that they only
correct. No sale deeds were executed; and it appears from
the mutations that the defendants merely purported to transfer
their interest in these plots ... column of proprietorship according to the rules
governing mutation proceedings. Moreover, the defendants
have made it clear in their written statements also that they only
unless other proved by cogent, convincing and judicial
.
confidence conspiring evidence. Mutation attestation proceedings
cannot be presumed to be otherwise incorrect, untrue ... well settled law that mutation does not confer any
title. The mutation proceedings are summary in nature and are
only for fiscal purpose to determine
action or assertion of
the defendant, then he must take proceedings within six years from
the date of such actions or assertions ... well settled law that mutation does not confer any title.
The mutation proceedings are summary in nature and are only for
fiscal purpose to determine
mutation
attested in the year 1958, even then the suit cannot be held to
be beyond limitation for the simple reason that mutation in itself ... well settled law that mutation does not confer
any title. The mutation proceedings are summary in
nature and are only for fiscal purpose to determine
correct. No sale deeds were
executed; and it appears from the mutations that the defendants
merely purported to transfer their interest in these plots ... column of proprietorship according to the rules governing mutation
proceedings. Moreover, the defendants have made it clear in their
written statements also that they only
wherein it was held that the mutation proceedings are not
judicial and they do not decide the title. It was observed:-
::: Downloaded ... degree
.
based on the mischievous but persistent error that the
proceedings for the mutation of names are judicial
proceedings in which the title
below have unnecessarily been swayed by
some sort of entry made in mutation No. 166 dated 27.04.2001
Ex. DW-3/A to conclude that it recorded ... Land Revenue Act , whereas, the mutation
::: Downloaded on - 24/12/2022 09:18:40 :::CIS
21
proceedings by themselves do not determine the question
basis of mutation Ext.D10, which was entered
and sanctioned on 12.04.1982. This mutation also reveals that
plaintiff was the owner only ... land,
therefore, there was no need for him to have assailed mutation
proceedings till and so long no active threat to his title.
27. Strong
clear ouster by denying the title of
other cosharers and mutation in the revenue records in the
name of one cosharers would ... basis of the order of the Municipal Authorities in the
mutation proceedings does not arise.
27. So far as submission of Mr. Ghosh
