person. The duplicate and triplicate copy of the manufacturer's invoice will be endorsed by the Range Superintendent showing new destination."
Vide Central ... with respect to registered person issuing invoice under Rule 57G above will mutates mutandis also apply in the case of manufacturers issuing invoices under Rule
points with in week ,falling which, the case of
mutation will be filled without taking any action.
Point No1.: Original document be submitted and also ... arrears and C.F. Charges deposited before mutation,
indemnity bond and affidavit regarding will that this is the first and last one, building plan from
mutation of exchange is Ex. C-12 vide which the mutation of exchange was dismissed. However, it was sanctioned on 10.6.2011. The said mutation ... mutation has been sanctioned lateron on the basis of exchange agreement dated 6.11.2006 then the order of rejecting of the mutation will have no bearing
applied for Mutation application for Mutation Yes or No
(b) if yes, please supply certified copy of the same i.e. will or succession
certificate ... owner. Provide the 'Certified
copy of the same (Application for Mutation & will /Succession certificate)
(c) Has any other person shown also
Appellant had filed an application seeking information regarding the cancellation of mutation in
respect of property no. 2058/VIII & 2466/IX Bazar Sita ... replied that the mutation cases is pending in the Civil Court at Tis Hazari, Delhi and the
decision on mutation will be taken
mutation dated 25.07.2014. PIO replied on 21.04.2015. Appellant filed First
Appeal and thereafter, approached the Commission.
Decision :
3. The appellant applied for mutation of legal ... refusing the mutation. The Commission directs the CPIO to provide reasons if
mutation is rejected, if not inform when mutation will be done
letter of 30.7.2007, the appellant had
requested for mutation of her House No. 1058/1. As mutation was not done, she
had sought information about ... relevant papers have since been
traced out and the processing of mutation will be completed in 03 months time.
DECISION
4. The CPIO is directed
Mafatlal Holdings Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax on 23 April, 2003
Equivalent citations
Mishapar Investments Ltd. vs Ito on 23 February, 2006
Equivalent citations: [2006]8SOT532(MUM)
ORDER
discretion to chose amongst the nominees in whose favour the shares will be mutated. A member will be entitled to alter his nomination during
