enter into
agreement including tenancy agreement for renting warehouse
and performing the obligations as entrusted to it under the
Master Services Agreement.
d. Mr. Ghosh ... Mutual Non-
Disclosure Agreement and the defendant no.1 never acted in
furtherance of any oral agreement or Mutual Non-Disclosure
Agreement.
f. Mr. Ghosh
fifth respondent and her husband, namely,
Sudalaimani, they entered into a mutual agreement dated 09.02.2015 and
they got separated, when the petitioner ... separated from the
fifth respondent by customary divorce by executing mutual agreement
dated 09.02.2015. That apart, the petitioner also disputed the birth of the
female
request of further constructing the suit property in terms of their mutual
Agreement and threatened that he would complain to the police and other
authorities ... sign certain
documents without disclosing the contents and the alleged mutual
Agreement dated 25.06.2008 was a part of the said documents.
22. The defendant
also brought into writing. The documents indicate
Memorandum of Understanding-cum-Mutual agreement is in
force for a lock in period of 3 years ... Defendants failed to
comply the terms and conditions of the mutual agreement
dated 26.06.2014 and also the original Memorandum of
Understanding dated 22.09.2012. The Defendants
RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME reads as under: -
" ARTICLE 27 MUTUAL AGREEMENT PROCEDURE
1. Where a person considers that the actions ... arrive at a satisfactory solution, to
resolve the case by mutual agreement with the competent authority of the
other Contracting State, with a view
this property and accordingly accepted the
Defendant's proposal. Thereafter, mutual agreement
dated 18.02.2017 was reduced to writing.
iii. The suit property measuring ... ground floor and first floor at the time
of execution of mutual agreement dated 18.02.2017.
The suit property is more specifically shown in red
color
tenants of the
complainant Ram Nath Kumar made two forged mutual agreements (valuable
security signatures) bearing forged signatures dated 02.03.2007 and 04.01.2008
and claimed ... Further, both accused persons
dishonestly used the said forged mutual agreements which they knew or had
reason to believe to be forged document and thereby
abovesaid properties was ever handed over to the accused. Only a
mutual agreement dated 01.03.2017 has been placed on record to prove
the liability ... towards the complainant pertaining to the sale of properties and
the mutual agreement dated 01.03.2017 is neither registered nor an
instrument of sale. With respect
abovesaid properties was ever handed over to the accused. Only a
mutual agreement dated 01.03.2017 has been placed on record to prove
the liability ... towards the complainant pertaining to the sale of properties and
the mutual agreement dated 01.03.2017 is neither registered nor an
Digitally signed
MARILYN by MARILYN
abovesaid properties was ever handed over to the accused. Only a
mutual agreement dated 01.03.2017 has been placed on record to prove
the liability ... towards the complainant pertaining to the sale of properties and
the mutual agreement dated 01.03.2017 is neither registered nor an
instrument of sale. With respect
