policy has acquired lapsed status from 11.01.1993.
Both pleas are mutually destructive and considered together would give rise to the
result the insurance policy
investment
made by the complainant is for commercial purpose. By raising mutually destructive pleas, the
opposite party has attempted to evade its liability
injury to the person using the
goods;
(5) permits the
hoarding or destruction of goods, or refuses to sell the goods or to make them ... amount paid by him.
18. The
appellant projected two contradictory and mutually destructive pleas that the
first respondent cannot proceed against payment schedule mentioned
revise the plan. For their such mutually inconsistent
stand which are also self-destructive, we find the complainant should not
suffer who is a lady
which the records have admittedly been
destroyed along with the order for destruction of the records, if available in the records.
If such order ... affidavit to the Commission with a copy to the Appellant affirming the
destruction of records sought by the Appellant while indicating
what records have been
different times. They also
informed that whatever details were available about the destruction had already
been communicated to the Appellant and the bank ... disclosed. They admitted that the bank had a register in which the
destruction of records, from time to time, was duly recorded
Commission on any
the RTI application dated 15/04/2008 has been mutually agreed date and can
adequately taken care of. obtain the information ... applications of the record.
Appellant were used as instruments of destruction of
the organisations.
1.(g) The valid reasons for no action taken
New India Assurance Co.Ltd. vs M/S Dani Mourdhwaj Cold Storage ... on 10 February
Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. vs M/S Sathyanarayana Setty & Sons on 14 March, 2012
Namrata R. Peety,, Aurangabad vs Department Of Income Tax on 18 September, 2012
IN THE
