service on medical ground i.e. on account of Pathological Myopia, more than 4D, vide letter dated 23.06.2005. Petitioner preferred an appeal before the Appellate ... three Doctors of Pathological Department having specialization in the desease Pathological Myopia more than 4D, of S.M.S. Hospital, Jaipur:-
Short controversy raised
Note: (i) Myopia in the above standards should not exceed -- 4 D.
(ii) Manifest Hypermetropia should not exceed + 1.5 D.
(iii) In cases with error ... while the standard was reduced, Note (i), which runs as follows:
"Myopia in the above standards should not exceed -- 4 D."
continued
abroad) needing revascularization;
(iii) Bone marrow transplant;
(iv) Operative correction for high myopia case;
(v) Complex cyanote Heart-Lesion and newly born infants suffering from
Medical
Board and the petitioner was again declared unfit due to myopia in both
the eyes. The petitioner appeared before Review Medical Board
petitioner No.1-Seema was suffering from BE
Normal (Refractive Error Simple Myopia), which was not any
disability and ZERO percent disability and petitioner
found
that she was suffering from BE High Myopia, which was not
any disability and ZERO percent disability was found. The
Medical Board has opined
dated 27.7.2022, it
was found that he was suffering from BE High Myopia, which was
not any disability and ZERO percent disability was found
pink neuroretinal rim. No retinal
abnormalities are found. There is low compound
myopia (uncomplicated). Intraocular pressure is
within normal range (without any medications).
The defects
reports furnished by the Medical doctor he was found unfit due to Myopia and second opinion of the Medical Board consisting of the department
