Maharashtra v. Nav Bharat Builders 1994 Supp
(3) SCC 83 and Nathani Steels Ltd. v. Associated Constructions 1995
Supp (3) SCC 324. In each ... release of admitted dues. It noted that in Nav Bharat Builders,
Nathani Steels and P.K. Ramaiah & Co., the Court examined the facts in
order
Bharat Coking Coal Limited v. M/s.Annapurna
Construction reported in AIR 2003 SC 3660, and Chairman &
MD, NTPC Ltd v. Reshmi Constructions, Builders ... 1996] Page 6 of 20
Supp(3) SCC 83 and Nathani Steels Ltd v. Associated
Constructions reported in 1995 Supp
submissions, Mr. Singh has relied upon the judgments in Nathani Steel Ltd.
v. Associated Constructions (1995) Supp (3) SCC 324; Hira Lal Hari ... initiation and continuance of such proceedings lack bonafides."
35. In Nathani Steel Ltd. v. Associated Constructions, the Supreme Court
W.P.(C) No. 11247
agreement between the parties. Reliance is placed on the
decision in Nathani Steel Ltd. v. Associated Constructions 1995 Supp (3)
SCC 324 to argue that
International) Company Limited 2011 ( 10) SCC
420, National Insurance Company Limited v. Boghara Polyfab
Private Limited 2018 (12) SCALE 654, Nathani Steels Limited v.
Associated
substantiate that allegation.
10. In National Insurance Company Limited v. Boghara Polyfab Private
Limited the Supreme Court explained the law in relation to 'accord ... Damodar Valley Corporation v. K.K. Kar (1974) 1
SCC 141; Nathani Steels Ltd. v. Associated Constructions 1995 Supp (3)
SCC 324; Ambika Construction
placed on the decision in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Boghara
Polyfab (P) Ltd. ( 2009) 1 SCC 267 and Union of India v. Master
Construction ... Ltd. v. Boghara Polyfab (P)
Ltd. ( supra) and Union of India v. Master Construction Company
(supra). He also relied upon the decisions in Nathani Steels
Steel Authority Of India Limited vs Competition Commission Of India & Ors. on 6 May, 2011
Author: S. Muralidhar
Bench: S. Muralidhar
* IN THE HIGH ... DELHI AT NEW DELHI
20
+ W. P. (C) 2691/2011
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Additional
Solicitor General with
this regard the following passage in Gayatri Project Limited v. Sai
Arb.P. 810/2016 Page 10 of 12
Krishna Construction (supra) paraphrasing ... Ramaiah and Co. v. NTPC 1994 Supp
(3) SCC 126 nor Nathani Steels 1995 Supp (3) SCC 324 but only
distinguished it on the ground
