exercise of powers under section 3(2) of the National Security
Act, 1980.
- : 2 :-
1. The petitioner has been supplied the grounds for detention ... against the petitioner. After drawing proceedings under
section 3 of the National Security Act,1980 the District Magistrate
has passed an order of detention without
Magistrate, Auraiya exercising the power under section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980.
The instant Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article ... report as envisaged under section 3(5) of the National Security Act, 1980 were put up to the Under Secretary
Union of more than 700 FPS owners under the
National Food Security Act, 2013 (NFSA), who are engaged in providing
rations to TPDS card holders ... Affairs,
Food & Public Distribution, GoI for distribution under
the National Food Security Act (NFSA) cannot be used
for the operationalization of any State specific
brother because Gaurav @ Gora who is detained in district jail under National Security Act had suspected that his brother Raja had given information against ... brother and accused Gaurav @ Gora, who was detained in jail under National Security Act who had suspicion that he was sent to jail under National
Order, 2013 as ultra vires to Essential Commodities Act, 1955 , National
Food Security Act, 2013 , Central Control Order, 2015 and also Article ... security" (Assistance to
State Governments) Rule, 2015 under Section 39 (2) (e) read with Section 22
(4) (d) of the National Food Security Act
preventive detention dated 27.05.2021 under Section 3(2) of the National
Security Act, 1980 (for short 'the 1980 Act') passed by respondent ... factual matrix on the anvil of the statutory
provisions under the National Security Act and the exposition of law laid
down in various decisions
Magistrate, Imphal West had issued
Detention Orders on 17.7.2006 under the National Security Act, 1980 for
four detenu. Assailing the detention order, one Thounaojam Romen ... West, he had issued forged detention
orders dated 17.7.2006 under the National Security Act for four detenus.
When challenge to the detention order was made
pari
materia to the provisions contained in Section 10 of the National
Security Act, 1980. The provision casting a duty on the
appropriate Government ... were interpreted
and it was held that Section 10 of the National Security Act, 1980
does not mean anything more than, "forward
under COFEPOSA
and NDPS Act provides different scheme than the scheme
engrafted in the National Security Act or other Preventive
Detention Laws including the Maharashtra ... detention orders made either under
COFEPOSA, PIT NDPS or National Security Act,
1980, as the case may be.
(3) The detaining authority is under
under COFEPOSA
and NDPS Act provides different scheme than the scheme
engrafted in the National Security Act or other Preventive
Detention Laws including the Maharashtra ... detention orders made either under
COFEPOSA, PIT NDPS or National Security Act,
1980, as the case may be.
(3) The detaining authority is under
