before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission, New Delhi (for short ‘the NCDRC’). As per
the impugned order, the NCDRC allowed revision
petition ... District Forum that
was taken up in revision before the NCDRC by the
respondent herein, which culminated in the impugned
order.
7. A perusal
appellants were before the
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New
Delhi (‘the NCDRC’) raising a grievance with regard
to the respondent-Bank having enhanced ... regard to the originally provided drawal limit
and therefore deficient. However, the NCDRC having
1
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6511-6512 OF 2009
taken note that
passed by the National Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission, New Delhi (For short `NCDRC’) in First Appeal
NO. 437 of 2010 and also the order dated ... passed by the
NCDRC in Review Application NO.129 of 2011.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the appeal
papers. The matter lies
conclusion reached by the
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New
Delhi (‘the NCDRC’) is not justified. Though, we
arrive at such conclusion and we deem ... appropriate
to set aside the order passed by the NCDRC, we note
that in the instant case, the LIC policy in question
which was taken
herein was before the National
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi
(‘the NCDRC’) in FA No.77/2005. The NCDRC having
taken note ... precaution in treating
the appellant herein. Therefore, in that
circumstance, when the NCDRC has taken into
consideration all aspects of the matter and has
arrived
passed
by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission, New Delhi (‘the NCDRC’) is assailed
herein, inasmuch as the claim of the appellant for
payment ... interest was not considered, the reasons
as assigned by the NCDRC to ultimately dismiss the
revision petition on holding, is not a consumer is
Signature
appeal papers.
2. We note that the National Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission (NCDRC), while arriving at its
conclusion through the impugned orders dated 13.11.2009
passed
State Commission as
well as by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission (NCDRC), we see no reason to interfere with
the orders impugned
