entire paragraph in the order has been devoted by the NCDRC to highlight that the project was not that huge and talk of common areas ... common areas and common facilities. Be that as it may, what the NCDRC omitted to bear in mind was that the appellants were allured
note at this stage, that the view which was taken by the NCDRC in the present case was contrary to its earlier decision in Vidya ... Devi (supra). In that case, the NCDRC upheld the repudiation of an insurance claim under a life insurance cover by the LIC on the ground
passed by National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,
New Delhi (for short “NCDRC”) in Original Complaint Nos. 89 of 1995 and 90
of 1995, whereby ... apparels sent through cargo receipt Nos. 34116,
34117 and 34118, before NCDRC, New Delhi. Initially complaints were filed
only as against Respondent
passed by National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,
New Delhi (for short “NCDRC”) in Original Complaint Nos. 89 of 1995 and 90
of 1995, whereby ... apparels sent through cargo receipt Nos. 34116,
34117 and 34118, before NCDRC, New Delhi. Initially complaints were filed
only as against Respondent
Allied (Garments) Exports Indus Tries Pvt. Ltd. vs. DDA 1990 SSC OnLine NCDRC 41, wherein it has been held that a consumer complaint ... Satish Kumar Pandey v. Unitech Ltd. 2015 SCC OnLine NCDRC 14; SarojKharbanda v. Bigjo's Estate Ltd. 2018 SCC OnLine NCDRC
Para 21 and 23;
(ii) Amarjit Singh Vs. Gagandeep Singh & Ors. (NCDRC in Revision Petition No. 2512 to 2518 of 2011 decided ... cases of Ashok Kumar Goel Vs. Branch Manager, ICCI - 2016 SCC Online NCDRC 65, Padmini Malhotra vs. Era Land Marks (India) Ltd. - 2015 SCC online
ready reference:
"16. We have failed to comprehend as to what NCDRC meant when it observed that the appellants "ought to have known ... aggrieved consumer to seek relief before the Consumer Fora. The reasoning of NCDRC is, thus, indefensible. Indeed, the appellants had purchased their respective flats
ready reference:
"16. We have failed to comprehend as to what NCDRC meant when it observed that the appellants "ought to have known ... aggrieved consumer to seek relief before the Consumer Fora. The reasoning of NCDRC is, thus, indefensible. Indeed, the appellants had purchased their respective flats
ready reference:
"16. We have failed to comprehend as to what NCDRC meant when it observed that the appellants "ought to have known ... aggrieved consumer to seek relief before the Consumer Fora. The reasoning of NCDRC is, thus, indefensible. Indeed, the appellants had purchased their respective flats
Scdrc, however, did not notice the decision of this Court, and hence, Ncdrc was (it was urged) justified in correcting the error having regard ... have arisen provided the conditions of exclusion were provided to the insured. Ncdrc missed the concurrent findings of both the District Forum and Scdrc that
