fuEu U;kf;d n`"VkUr izLrqr fd;s %&
01.NCDRC REVISION PETITION NO. 4615 OF 2010
LIC OF INDIA VS. JANBARDHAN GOPAL ... Appeal No 1129/2011 LIC of
India Vs. Smt. Shilpa Raghavendra
04.NCDRC REVISION PETITION NO. 3842/2012 N.
MUTHUVEL Vs. LIC Dated 03rd
have also been apprised that National Consumer
Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), in Appeal Execution
No.100 of 2017 etc., vide order dated 20.03.2018, has
directed ... submitted by Mr. Ranjit Kumar that the
beneficiaries of the orders by NCDRC are also on the portal
created by Mr. Pawan Shree Agrawal, learned
petitioner had filed a petition before the National Consumer
Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) for Specific Performance
of the Agreement and further compensation. It was submitted ... that
since the disputes before NCDRC and the Arbitral Tribunal are the
O.M.P.(COMM.) 162/2018 Page 6 of 15
same, the proceedings
said to be barred by limitation. Judgment of Hon'ble NCDRC, New Delhi reported in 2005 (2) CPR 1 NC, wherein it was held ... plot is delivered with all amenities. Judgment of Hon'ble NCDRC, New Delhi in WP No.30394 of 2011 reported in CDJ 2012 APHSC
order passed by the National Consumer Dispute
Redressal Commission whereby the NCDRC had reduced the
quantum of compensation awarded to the appellant by the
State ... that due to the medical negligence that has been found by
the NCDRC as well as by the State Commission, the order of
the State
respondent.
3. In the present matter, the National Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission (NCDRC) by an interim order had directed that
the respondent ... aside the order under appeal.
2
6. We, however, request the NCDRC to dispose of the pending
complaint as expeditiously as possible, preferably within three
RESPONDENT
ORDER
Leave granted.
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (“the NCDRC” reversed an
order passed by the State Commission which in turn had affirmed ... concern of
the respondent. The sole basis of the order of the NCDRC is that the appellant had failed to
establish that the aforesaid entity
complaint raises such complicated questions as cannot be determined
by the NCDRC. It is only when the dispute arising for adjudication is
such as would ... Synco Industries case (supra)
this Court upheld the order of NCDRC holding the complaint before it
not a fit case to be tried under
submitted that in respect of employees of National
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), the
Tribunal had allowed the similar benefit, which is being prayed ... proceedings before the
DRT are judicial proceedings like the proceedings under
NCDRC or for that purpose in other Tribunals and hence,
there are no difference
RamjilalVs.Sarvodaya Medical 2542 Consumer 1986-1996, FA
No.4/93 NCDRC, decided 17th Feb.1995
8
CC/09/03
5. Dilip Narayan BhelandeVs ... Mumbai, decided
on 11th February 2015.
12. FA No.117 of 2007 NCDRC
13. Samira Kohli Vs.Prabha Manchanda & Anr- Appeal ( Civil
