Commission 1 in Consumer
Complaint Nos 45 and 46 of 2015. The NCDRC disposed of the
proceedings by directing the appellants to refund the entire ... paid by way of compensation. The order passed
by the NCDRC reads as follows:
“(i) The opposite party No.1 in Consumer Complaint
dated 23
February 2016 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission1. The NCDRC rejected the complaint of the
appellant alleging a deficiency of service ... during any further period
of extension thereof the property (except packing
1 “NCDRC”
2
materials of any kind) or any part thereof
described
view, it would have been in the interests of
justice for the NCDRC to condone the delay, subject to an order
of costs. By adopting ... unduly technical view, the NCDRC has
compounded the delay and expense for parties. Accordingly, we
allow the appeal and set aside the impugned order
held that
the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
(hereinafter referred to as “NCDRC”) had no jurisdiction to
adjudicate the legality behind the demand of “composition ... Sunita (supra) is well reasoned, as it validly holds
that the NCDRC lacks jurisdiction to decide the legitimacy behind
the demand of “composition
January 2018 of the National
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission 1. The NCDRC restored the judgment
of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jaipur 2 dated ... April 1992, a letter of allotment was issued to the
1 “NCDRC”
2 “District Forum”
2
respondent intimating an allotment of a tenement in House
Akruli Road, Kandivili East, Mumbai, approached
the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC),
New Delhi, by filing Consumer Case No.203 of 2013 alleging
certain ... complainants in said
complaint. The application came to be rejected by the NCDRC
insofar as the appellant was concerned on the grounds that
Delay condoned.
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
(“NCDRC”) has held the right of the petitioner to file a
written statement stands closed since ... result in a delay of the proceedings filed by
them before the NCDRC. The first and second respondents
are the complainants before the NCDRC
minus pension‟ was also prevalent in the
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission („NCDRC‟) and the
Delhi School Tribunal („DST') and there ... Illustratively some of the
pay slips issued to the members of the NCDRC have been enclosed with the
petition. It is further submitted that
arisen from an order of the National
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (“NCDRC”) dated 16
September, 2014 in Revision Petition No.4856 of 2012.
The dispute ... violation of the warranty terms is proved.”
Before the NCDRC, it emerged that the finding of fact
by the SCDRC to the effect that
Reason:
Notice was issued in these proceedings on 7 January 2019.
1 “NCDRC”
2
A counter affidavit has been filed by the second respondent
which ... ordered to be deleted by the NCDRC from the array of
parties.
The consumer complaint filed by the appellant, which is
an association representing