from 10.02.2013) to
31.05.2016, within 2 months, from the date of
1 NCDRC
2 SCDRC
2
receipt of a certified copy of this order, failing ... Appellant preferred appeal against such order passed by
SCDRC before the NCDRC. The NCDRC issued inter-alia the following
directions:
“(C) Compensation:
The compensation
life insurance. This decision has been upheld in
revision by the NCDRC. The insurer is hence in appeal.
3 On 10 July 2009, the spouse ... life insurance
Date: 2019.04.24
16:06:38 IST
Reason:
1
―NCDRC‖
2
―SCDRC‖
1
term plan policy of the appellant for an insurance cover
Delay condoned.
2 Leave granted.
3 The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission [NCDRC] 1 has set
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
DEEPAK SINGH
Date ... State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission 2 holding the
Reason:
1 NCDRC
2 SCDRC
2
respondents guilty of medical negligence in the treatment of the spouse
approached the National Consumer
Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as the NCDRC) vide
consumer complaint no. 115 of 2007 seeking following reliefs ... concerned, the same were not
accepted by NCDRC and were decided against the respondent-insurer. The
said two grounds
JUDGMENT
Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
(“NCDRC”) by its impugned order dated 8 June 2018 disposed of
the consumer ... under
Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The
NCDRC has come to the conclusion that though under the terms
signed by
SANJAY KUMAR
Date: 2019.04.24
16:06:37 IST
Reason:
1 “NCDRC”
2 “SCDRC”
3 “the District Forum”
4 “LIC of India ... terms of the policy.
In a revision by the insurer, the NCDRC by its judgment dated 29 April 2016 reversed
the judgment of the District
National Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission1 on 19 September 2018. The NCDRC partly allowed the appeal
filed by the insurer against a decision of the State ... respondent, Mahendra Construction, was the original complainant before the
1 “NCDRC”
2 “SCDRC”
2
SCDRC. The respondent purchased a hydraulic excavator machine
which was allegedly booked by
the appellants. On 15 February 2019, the NCDRC dismissed the complaint, in terms of
the following directions:
“Learned counsel ... evidence
within a period of four weeks, failing which the
1 “NCDRC”
2
complaint shall stand dismissed automatically.”
In spite of the above order
Reason: 1
First Appeal No. 386 of 2018
2
“NCDRC”
3
The State Commission
Page 1 of 13
to Rs 1,00,000/- although ... State Commission by its order dated 4.1.2018, the
complainant approached the NCDRC through First Appeal No.
386 of 2018.
6. The Appellate forum referred
Medical College Police Station. Eventually, a complaint was filed before the NCDRC.
The NCDRC has held that there was a deficiency of service ... duty had also
been assigned the task of being a Bartender. The NCDRC placed reliance on safety
guidelines for water sports issued by the National
