preferred an
application bearing Application No.77 of 1982,
seeking a negative declaration that the deceased
Jaisingh was not the tenant of the suit lands ... 2335-1995.DOC 7/30
finality and the negative declaration sought by the landlord was
refused. The tribunal could not have resorted to a statement
M/S. Veekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd vs Shri. Bhalchandra D. Patil And Ors on
could not get an injunction merely on the basis
of a negative declaration that the opposite party does not have a right on the
suit ... prima facie, is not maintainable merely on the basis of a negative
declaration on certain vague legal bars, which are mixed questions of fact
This evidence
of the prosecution reflected from the
officially recorded dying declaration
negates the case of abetment by the
appellant/accused to the deceased
This evidence
of the prosecution reflected from the
officially recorded dying declaration
negates the case of abetment by the
appellant/accused to the deceased
needs no mention that the relief of
negative declaration may be prayed much less granted.
Whether the appellant/plaintiff would succeed in the
suit
Arefin
...for the Opposite Parties.
The defendant in a suit for declaration and permanent
injunction has preferred this application being aggrieved by an
order dated ... plaintiff had filed the suit in
the nature of a negative declaration with regard to the quantum
of money and whether the said suit under
there being a right the suit
has been filed for a negative declaration. He would rely on the
Judgment of this Court
(i) A.Ramanathan
said
paragraph of the plaint that by a deed of declaration dated
September 21, 1994 by and between Anup Kumar Mukhopadhyay
and Aloke Kumar Mukhopadhyay ... plaintiff's
title in the suit property and the negative declaration that the
principal defendants have no title in the suit property, despite
opposite party seeking declaration that the defendant/petitioner had no
right to dispossess the plaintiff from the suit property, for declaration that the defendant ... maintainable in view of the plaintiff
having sought a negative declaration, also because the development agreement executed
in the year 2006 had itself spent
