appeal Court below ought to have appreciated that the suit for negative
declaration was not maintainable. It was further contended that the plaintiff
could ... decree a suit by way of a negative declaration. In the present suit
though the prayer has been couched in a negative language, a positive
Selvaraj vs Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant India ... on 16 July, 2021
Author: N.Seshasayee
Bench
Selvaraj vs Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant India ... on 16 July, 2021
Author: N.Seshasayee
Bench
Selvaraj vs Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant India ... on 16 July, 2021
Author: N.Seshasayee
Bench
within the requirements
of the provisions of the Tenancy Act for
negative declaration to be obtained under sec.
76(b) He complained that no parties
succinctly, to grant in favour of the Petitioners a negative
declaration that no amount is due from the Petitioners to the
Respondent Bank
held above to be not
maintainable), would tantamount to a standalone
negative declaration, which cannot stand in law
on its own footing. Such being
theory of second marriage. Even
though trial Court had given negative declaration against defendant-
Sunanda, she has neither preferred first appeal nor filed the cross
defined in the RTI Act . Once the answer is in
the negative, declaration has to be granted as a matter of course.
When once Dharmapuram
from
the additional evidence.
The plaintiff/appellant filed a suit for
negative declaration that the
defendant/respondent is not his married wife. It is
alleged
