reported in 1999(7) SCC 685 ( State of Maharashtra Vs. Tapas D.Neogy ) and submitted that as per the dictum laid down in the said ... reported in 1999(7) SCC 685 ( State of Maharashtra Vs. Tapas D.Neogy ) wherein it has been held as follows:-
Having considered the divergent views
judgment of the Supreme Court in STATE
OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. TAPAS D. NEOGY ((1999) 7 SCC 685). Reliance is placed on
the observation that ... specific and narrow limits.
31. In STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. TAPAS D. NEOGY ((1999) 7 SCC 685),
the Supreme Court had occasion to consider
Police ), (1997) 7 SCC 685
( State of Maharashtra ..vs.. Tapas D.Neogy ), (2018) 2 SCC 372 ( Teesta Atul
Setalvad ..vs.. State of Gujarat ... reported in
(1997) 7 SCC 685 ( State of Maharashtra ..vs.. Tapas D.Neogy ) and it was
observed that 'Having considered the divergent views taken
Supreme Court is extracted hereunder.
"6. The question in Tapas D. Neogy case [ State of
Maharashtra v. Tapas D. Neogy ... conclusion that the
High Court of Bombay committed [Tapas Dhrublal
Neogy v. A.K. Asthana, Criminal Application
6/11
http://www.judis
Supreme Court is extracted hereunder.
"6. The question in Tapas D. Neogy case [ State of
Maharashtra v. Tapas D. Neogy ... conclusion that the High Court of
Bombay committed [Tapas Dhrublal Neogy v. A.K.
Asthana, Criminal Application No. 826 of 1996,
order dated
appears to have been concurred in by two decisions reported in - 'Neogi Ghose and Co. v. Nehall Singh
Himmat Sahai Singh v. Llewhellen (1885) ILR 11 C 486, Kailash Chandra Neogi v. Harischandra Biswas ( 1900) 5 CWN 158, Nath Khan v. Sewak Koeri
decision of the Apex Court in STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. TAPAS D. NEOGY , wherein Their Lordships have held that a plain reading of sub-section
real consideration but that the real consideration was different. Kailash Chandra Neogi v. Harish Chandra Biswas (1900) 5 CWN 158; Nathu Khan v. Sewak Koeri
years' purchase, is illustrated by several decisions. In Harish Chunder Neogy v. Secretary of State
