State Of Maharashtra vs Tapas D. Neogy on 16 September, 1999
PETITIONER:
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
TAPAS D. NEOGY
DATE OF JUDGMENT ... concerned, the short facts are that one Tapas D.Neogy was an
Architect & Town Planner in the Department of Town Planning
of the Union
Phanindra Chandra Neogy vs The King on 21 October, 1948
Equivalent citations: (1949)51BOMLR440
JUDGMENT
Simonds, J.
1. This appeal is brought by special leave ... Fort William in Bengal dismissing the appeal of the appellant, Phanindra Chandra Neogy, from the conviction and sentence passed on him by the Chief Magistrate
observed in para 12 as
under:-
"12. Having gone through Tapas Neogy [(1999) 7 SCC
685], we are inclined to hold that ... possible to urge that
in Tapas Neogy, the Supreme Court was primarily
considering whether the bank account of the accused could
be property within
Debapratim Neogi & Ors vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 7 October, 2013
Author: Ashim Kumar Roy
Bench: Ashim Kumar Roy
Form ... With
C.R.A.N. No. 3029 of 2013
Debapratim Neogi & Ors.
Vs.
State of West Bengal & Anr.
For the Petitioners : Mr. Shiladitya
Application For Anticipatory Bail ... vs Keshab Chandra Neogi @ Khokan Neogi on 20 July, 2017
Author: Dipankar Datta
Bench: Dipankar Datta ... filed on 13th June, 2017.
And
In the matter of : Keshab Chandra Neogi @ Khokan Neogi
Petitioner.
Mr. Milan Mukherjee
Mr. Rahul Ganguly.
..... For the Petitioner
Rongon Neogi vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 22 February, 2010
Author: Ashim Kumar Roy
Bench: Ashim Kumar Roy
1
Form ... Justice Ashim Kumar Roy
C.R.R. No. 31 of 2010
Rongon Neogi
versus
State of West Bengal & Anr.
For Petitioners : Mr. Arup
outset, we must begin by referring
to the decision in Tapas D. Neogy (supra), a case arising from
three First Information Reports under Sections ... immovable property.
8. Decision of this Court in Tapas D. Neogy (supra) was in respect
of the bank accounts and it did not examine
Supreme Court in the case of State of
Maharashtra v. Tapas D.Neogy , (1999)7 SCC 685. The issue
before the Supreme Court was, whether ... Raju, the Supreme Court in the case of
Tapas D.Neogy (supra), did approve the line of reasoning
adopted by the Division Bench
petitioner, herein, Tapas Dhrubalal Ncogy is the son of Smt. Madhuri Neogy and claims to be her constituted attorney for the purposes of this petition ... Madhuri Neogy is old and infirm widow normally residing at Calcutta. The petitioner Tapas Neogy worked as an Architect and Town Planner in the Department
Supreme Court in the case of State of
Maharashtra v. Tapas D.Neogy , (1999)7 SCC 685. The
issue before the Supreme Court was, whether
