insurance policy was taken and with respect to non-fare paying passengers (NFPP), the policy indicates that liability had been taken with reference ... Learned counsel further submitted that the deceased Sundar alias Gangasundar was a NFPP and the liability was only for one person to the extent
amounting to Rs.60/-, and (ii) Rs.
200/- under the head of NFPP-2. He further submits that the
claimant/respondents were travelling ... Insurance Company has
charged a premium for covering the risk under NFPP, therefore,
liability to pay compensation cannot be fastened upon the
appellant. He further
amounting to Rs.60/-, and (ii) Rs.
200/- under the head of NFPP-2. He further submits that the
claimant/respondents were travelling ... Insurance Company has
charged a premium for covering the risk under NFPP, therefore,
liability to pay compensation cannot be fastened upon the
appellant. He further
collected for Non Fare Paid Passenger (NFPP). Therefore,
as per the condition enumerated in the policy, as
stipulated in the IMT Regulations, the risk ... collected under
the head Non Fare Paid Passenger (NFPP). It is revealed
from Ex.P.1 FIR that the claimant was travelling for
escorting
collected for Non Fare Paid Passenger (NFPP). Therefore,
as per the condition enumerated in the policy, as
stipulated in the IMT Regulations, the risk ... collected under
the head Non Fare Paid Passenger (NFPP). It is revealed
from Ex.P.1 FIR that the claimant was travelling for
escorting
respondent No.2 cover the risk of two
non fare paid passengers (NFPP) and therefore the
risk of the deceased was covered under the policy ... that
the insurer has collected separate premium
covering the risk of two NFPP and also cover the
risk of 2 WC and therefore the case
charged premium of Rs.50/- for Non-
Fare Paying Passengers ('NFPP') and, therefore, even if the finding
as recorded by the Tribunal that ... Kesu Singh and Om Prakash were
NFPP, in view of the premium charged by the Insurance Company,
it was liable for making payment of amount
charged premium of Rs.50/- for Non-
Fare Paying Passengers ('NFPP') and, therefore, even if the finding
as recorded by the Tribunal that ... Kesu Singh and Om Prakash were
NFPP, in view of the premium charged by the Insurance Company,
it was liable for making payment of amount
covers the risk of non fare paying passengers,
for short 'NFPP', hence MACT was not justified in
exonerating the insurer from the liability ... owner against claims putforth by third parties
and not by NFPP, while, coverage is available only if a
premium of Rs.75/- is paid
passenger. As per Ex.R1 - Policy, it stated that for NFPP Other than employees (IMT.37-A), Rs.75/- has been collected.
31. Learned ... paid towards paid driver/cleaner/coolies (IMT 39) and Rs.75/- towards NFPP, Other than employees (IMT.37-A).
36. Clause
