compensation is to be awarded on the principle of "no-fault liability". Similarly, Section 163A is also similar to Section ... proof of any fault or negligence in contrast to Section 166 providing for getting compensation on the basis of fault liability where the claimant
compensation is to be awarded on the principle of "no fault liability". Similarly, Section 163A is also similar to Section ... proof of any fault or negligence in contrast to section 166 providing for getting compensation on the basis of fault liability where the claimant
compensation amount on the principle of 'no fault liability'. In the said application, it was submitted that on 18th November, 1999, the petitioner ... fault of the victim. In view thereof, the claimants are entitled to the grant of compensation under 'no fault liability' to the tune
compensation amount on the principle of 'no fault liability'. In the said application, it was submitted that on 18.11.1999, the petitioner met with ... fault of the victim. In view thereof, the claimants are entitled to the grant of compensation under 'no fault liability' to the tune
fault liability. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has thereafter observed that 'absolute liability' or 'strict liability' and 'fault liability
claim application. The benefit falls under the category of 'no fault liability' and to award this compensation, the Tribunal is not required ... therefore, submitted that even on the basis of this 'no fault liability', the claimants are entitled to the interim compensation
Accident Claims Tribunal is right in allowing the application of No Fault Liability under Sec. 140 of the M.V.Act bearing ... High Court for redressal of grievance against the no fault liability. In support of his submissiona, Mr.Zhaveri has relied on case of Dimple
Gulamhussen Mohmadbhai Kazi vs Jahur Suleman Luhar on 23 August, 2002
Equivalent citations: 2003 A
labour court for about seven years or so. There was no fault on the part of the petitioner for such delay. The labour court ought ... which cannot be saddled with the liability of back wages for such a long period for no fault on its part. Apparently, these aspects were
years before the labour court and then before this Court for no fault either on the part of the petitioner or on the part ... opinion, respondent being a State, should not be saddled with the liability of full back wages for such an intervening period and in view
