Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

appellant/defendant No.2 being in violation of the interim injunction in the suit; (VI) attention is invited to the possession letter dated 28th June

February, 1981 of Shri Om Prakash, the principles of grant of interim injunction require a status quo to be maintainable with respect to the property ... outcome of the present suit. 16. The application for interim injunction is thus disposed of restraining CS(OS) No.353/2012 Page

permanent injunction as sought could not be granted, how could interim injunction be granted. 4. It was also enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff ... grant of relief of permanent injunction and interim injunction; (iv) the plaintiff has along with the plaint filed a copy of the registered sale deed

entire property including the portions which the defendants were directed vide interim order to vacate and have not vacated. 15. The application is accordingly allowed ... terms of the interim orders in suit is also passed in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendants and which injunction order shall continue

Delhi) and for injunction and recovery of mesne profits. 2. Notice of the appeal was issued and vide ex parte ad-interim order dated

Shashi vs Sudershan Sharma & Anr on 20 December, 2013 Author: Rajiv Sahai Endlaw Bench

Applications, of the plaintiff for interim relief restraining the defendants in this suit for specific performance of Agreement of Sale of immovable property from dispossessing ... interim order dated 03.02.2011, are for consideration. 2. The suit, as originally filed on 11.01.2011, was not for specific performance but for mandatory injunction directing

decree for possession of the subject property; and, (vi) decree for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from dealing with the subject property or raising ... September, 2016, when while issuing summons/notice thereof, vide ex-parte ad-interim order, the defendants restrained from creating third party rights in the subject

March, 2016 when while issuing summons thereof, vide ex parte ad interim order the defendant was restrained from selling or disposing of or transferring ... since the plaintiffs are not in possession, the suit for permanent injunction is not maintainable; (v) the valuation of the property is not more than

then in or about 1984 instituted a suit for permanent injunction against Om Prakash and in which suit Om Prakash put forth his claim ... property and/or from dispossessing Devi Ram therefrom. The said application for interim relief was allowed and Om Prakash restrained from demolishing the wall between