this Court in which an application for interim injunction
was also filed. The prayers in that suit were to restrain ITBP from encashing ... aspect of whether or not
the Plaintiff is entitled to an interim injunction during the pendency of the
suit and encashment of the performance bank
Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 („ CPC ‟),
seeking an interim injunction to restrain the Defendants inter alia from
manufacturing, selling or offering for sale, footwear including ... filing their written statement, and/or reply to the application
for interim injunction, the question of the Court determining if there was any
„admission
High Court at
Madras against the Respondents and others for permanent injunction
restraining them from passing off their cosmetic preparations bearing the
trademark JOLEN ... Madras High Court and an interim injunction was granted on 20th October
2004 restraining Respondents from using the trademark JOLEN as part of
their corporate
question that arises for determination in these applications is whether
the interim injunction granted by the Court in favour of the Plaintiff by its
order ... take away
the right of the Plaintiff to seek an interim injunction on the basis of Section
Second Floor of the
said property. An interim injunction to that effect was issued by this Court
on 24th August 1998. Notwithstanding this, on 28th
present Appellant (Defendant
No.2). The suit was for permanent injunction to restrain the Defendants from
using manufacturing, marketing, stopping, selling, displaying, advertising
through internet ... suits for the purposes of „case
management‟. The applications for interim injunction under Order XXXIX
Rules 1 and 2 CPC filed by the Plaintiff were
order of
this Hon'ble Court dated 22.09.2006 but for the injunction issued by
the Hon'ble Court of Madras.
6. That ... analysis of the above facts reveals that SPIL has an interim
injunction in its favour by virtue of the order dated 9th May 2007 passed
Code of Civil Procedure , 1908
(‗ CPC ') for interim injunction. Notice on this application was issued to the
Respondents/Defendants on 9th October
inconsistent pleas.
12. In Chemtura Corporation, the context was vacation of an interim stay
granted in favour of the Plaintiff. The plea of the Defendant ... Plaintiff to comply with the mandatory requirement and, therefore, the
interim injunction should be vacated. Importantly, the Court in that case
was not deciding
order of permanent
CS (OS) 1908/2002 Page 1 of 11
injunction restraining the Defendant from manufacturing, selling or offering
for sale toothbrushes, samples ... passed by this Court on 15 th April 2004 declining an
interim injunction, the Plaintiff /Applicant filed an appeal
