summons to issue to the Defendants granted an ex parte ad interim
injunction in IA No.6694 of 2009, under Order XXXIX Rules ... Defendants‟ marks
being registered, an ex parte order of interim injunction was not called for.
Alternatively, it was submitted that the cause of action paras
whether the Plaintiff has, for the purposes of grant of
an interim injunction, been able to make out a prima facie case that the
adoption ... Plaintiff as found in the pleadings and
urged that the interim injunction as prayed for should be granted in
favour of the Plaintiff
aforementioned suit IA No. 622 of 1989 was filed seeking
an interim injunction restraining the Defendants from infringing the
Plaintiff‟s trade mark ... learned Single
Judge rejected the plaintiff‟s prayer for an interim injunction. The
learned Single Judge noted that on 13th December 1993 the Assistant
Registrar
2008 Page 1 of 24
for an ad interim injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing,
selling, marketing, advertising or in any manner whatsoever using ... 11203/2007, 13536/2007 and
10753/2007 seeking an ad interim injunction against the respondent. In
these applications, the plaintiff sought to point out that
learned Single Judge of this Court
issued an ex parte interim injunction, which was subsequently confirmed
by the order dated 12th July 1996 in favour ... with the other, even by recollecting faint
impressions." The interim injunction was accordingly vacated.
15. The matter was then carried to the Supreme Court
consideration in this application is whether
there should be an interim injunction restraining the Defendant Hindustan
Unilever Limited ('HUL') from publishing ... respond to the
application filed by the Plaintiffs for an ad interim injunction. The
application was set down for hearing on the next
Ishi Khosla, this Court while granting interim injunction held
CS (OS) No. 1143 of 2004 Page 18 of 45
that the mark "Whole Foods ... same brand name. This court rejected the Plaintiff‟s application
for interim injunction on the ground that the Defendant was a prior user
Code of Civil Procedure 1908
( CPC ), ITC seeks an interim injunction to restrain Britannia from
continuing to use the impugned packaging for its Nutri Choice ... interim protection, ITC is likely to suffer
irreparable hardship since the loss of market share cannot adequately be
compensated later.
44. An interim injunction
plaintiffs. Senior counsel in
these circumstances prays for ex parte ad interim injunction."
2. The Court accordingly on that day passed an ex parte ... interim
injunction restraining the Defendants from selling, advertising, marketing
its clocks or any other clock under the names 'NEW 2020' and 'Chess
passed by
the learned Single Judge declining to vacate the interim injunction passed on
31st August 2018 in IA No.11667 ... suit)
under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC for vacating the said interim injunction.
2. The background facts are set out in the order dated 31st