came to know that during
the operation of the aforesaid interim injunction granted by this Court by its
order dated 23.02.1996, the respondents herein ... respondent No.1
herein), and on 23rd February, 1996, an interim injunction order was passed by
this Court in Suit No.471/1996 restraining
interim order dated 16th September, 2021.
2. By order dated 16th September, 2021, this Court was pleased to grant
an ex parte ad interim injunction ... been made
out and the plaintiff is entitled for grant of interim injunction.
4. The first and foremost submission made on behalf of the defendant
Court
obviously could not make any interim order which, though
ostensibly in form an order of interim injunction, in
substance amounted to a direction ... plaintiff to get an
injunction. If every disputed question of fact requires injunction then in all
suits interim injunction will automatically follow because every suit
summons to issue to the Defendants granted an ex parte ad interim
injunction in IA No.6694 of 2009, under Order XXXIX Rules ... Defendants‟ marks
being registered, an ex parte order of interim injunction was not called for.
Alternatively, it was submitted that the cause of action paras
Code of Civil
Procedure 1908 ( CPC ) is an application seeking an interim injunction
restraining the Respondents/Defendants from representing to the public at
large ... under Order XXXIX Rules 1
and 2 CPC for an interim injunction. The suit and application were listed
before the Vacation Court on 10th June
Code of
Civil Procedure , 1908 ( CPC ) for grant of interim injunction.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:AMIT
BANSAL
Signing Date:19.07.2023
CS(COMM ... application was issued on 15th
March, 2022. However, no ad interim injunction order was passed in favour
of the plaintiff. Thereafter, the matter was listed
with
the patented technology." The said interim order in Sterlite Technologies
Ltd. granting ad interim injunction was passed ex-parte. Interestingly in Para ... view that the
impugned interim order requires to be set aside and the application for
interim injunction i.e. IA 8878/2019 be heard once
defendants are seeking vacation of ex parte ad interim
injunction granted by this court in favour of the plaintiff on 16.4.2014.
2. The question ... this order is as to whether the ex
parte ad interim injunction order granted in favour of the plaintiff
deserves to be continued
Supreme Court with regard to principles governing the
grant of ad interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC . It will
be worthwhile ... party concerned and that in the event
of the ad interim injunction not being granted in its favour, it is likely
filed
an interim application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 Code of Civil Procedure
(hereinafter CPC ) to seek interim injunction against the defendant ... under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 of CPC to seek interim injunction
against the defendant - M/s Turning Point, and the latter being
