Procedure, 1908 (in short, „ CPC ‟) praying for grant of an ad interim
injunction restraining the defendants, their proprietors, partners, agents,
assigns, representatives, heirs, servants, dealers ... summation,
the plaintiff is entitled to an order of ad interim injunction as the marks in
question are deceptively similar to each other; the plaintiff
prima facie case in its favour for
grant of an ad interim injunction. Prima facie the packaging of the product
of the plaintiff ... SHALOO
BATRA
Signing Date:15.07.2022
18:13:31
case the ad-interim injunction as prayed for is not granted.
9. This Court had earlier issued
appeal arises on or about 30.04.2019 and an ad-interim
ex-parte order of injunction was granted in her favour on 10.07.2019,
which has been ... aside. The
respondents are restrained by way of an ad-interim injunction from using,
selling, soliciting, exporting, displaying, advertising or marketing their
product under
class of persons
likely to be affected by the grant of injunction.
The Court order must be effective, proportionate
and dissuasive, but must not create ... order dated 09.08.2019, this Court
had granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the Defendant Nos.
1-4 (and such other domains/domain owners
This Court, vide order dated 10.12.2019, passed an ex-parte ad-
interim injunction restraining the defendant no. 1 from using the
plaintiffs' trade marks ... trade mark. Where there is a probability of confusion in
business, an injunction will be granted even though the defendants
adopted the name innocently
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. vs Http.//Tamilrockers.Ws & Ors. on 10 October, 2022
Author
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. vs Moviesflix.Net_& Ors. on 10 October, 2022
Author: Navin
order dated 18.09.2019, this Court had
granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the Defendant Nos. 1 to
19 (and such other domains/domain ... orders dated 24.12.2019, 30.09.2019 and 12.07.2021
respectively, and the ex-parte ad-interim order dated 18.09.2019 was
thereby extended to Defendant
order dated 24.07.2019, this Court had
granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the Defendant No. 1,
their owners, partners, proprietors, officers, servants, employees ... counsel for the Plaintiff submits that pursuant to the
ex-parte ad interim order dated 24.07.2019, the Defendant No. 11 has
Signature Not Verified
Digitally
This Court is of the view that while passing a
website blocking injunction order, it would have
to also consider whether disabling access ... order dated 24.07.2019, this Court had granted an ex-parte
ad-interim injunction against the defendant no. 1 and other such
domains/domain owners/website
