Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Diageo Brands B.V. & Anr. vs Alcobrew Distilleries India Pvt Ltd on 19 December

fact that the learned ADJ did not grant ex-parte ad interim injunction, as sought by the petitioner. 3. The suit relates to a property ... discretionary. There is no right that inheres, in any party, to interim injunction under Order XXXIX. If, however, in granting, or rejecting an application preferred

there is a clear case for grant an ex parte ad interim injunction. 18. The plaintiff has impleaded Defendants 1 to 10 being the websites ... following reliefs be granted in its favour: a) An order for interim injunction restraining Defendant Nos. 1 - 10 (and other such rogue websites/ domains/ entities

Court be pleased to:- I. Pass an order of interim injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners, proprietors, their officers, servants, agents and representatives ... other mode or manner; II. Pass an order of interim injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners, proprietors, their officers, servants, agents and representatives

passing-off plaintiff's Trade Marks. That an ex-parte interim injunction was passed in favour of the plaintiff by order dated ... month of October, 2018 and there was an exparte ad interim injunction vide order dated 29.10.2018 and thereafter plaintiff withdrew the said first suit

plaintiff during the pendency of the plaintiff's interim injunction application. Reply by defendant to the application 18. The defendant has contested the maintainability ... damages ultimately awarded, (c) the time required for adjudication of an interim injunction Signature Not Verified 12 CS (Comm) 383/2020 Digitally Signed By:SUNIL

judgment disposes of IA 2821/2021, preferred by the plaintiff, seeking interim injunction against the defendant. Facts 2. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant

suit was a plain and simple suit for recovery of money. No interim relief was claimed in the suit. Nor is there any averment ... month of October, 2018 and there was an ex parte ad interim injunction vide order dated 29.10.2018 and thereafter plaintiff withdrew the said first suit

month of October, 2018 and there was an ex­ parte ad interim injunction vide order dated 29.10.2018 and thereafter plaintiff withdrew the said first suit

court - **** (ii) for an interim measure of protection in respect of any of the following matters, namely: - (a) the preservation, interim custody or sale ... expedient for the purpose of obtaining full information or evidence; (d) interim injunction or the appointment of a receiver; (e) such other interim measure