Rules 1 and 2 CPC , whereby the Plaintiff
seeks an ad-interim injunction restraining the Defendants and others acting
on their behalf from manufacturing, selling ... well as protecting its rights
against third parties. Details of interim injunction orders granted by different
Courts have been mentioned in para
behalf of the Defendants, for vacation of ex parte ad-interim injunction
granted vide order dated 20.01.2022, under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC .
2. Present ... this Court granted ex parte ad-interim injunction in
favour of the Plaintiffs and against the Defendants, as sought for.
Upon being served the Defendants
other
filed by the Defendant for vacation of ex-parte ad interim injunction granted
vide order dated 21.01.2022.
2. Plaintiff has filed the present suit ... inevitable.
8. On 21.01.2022, this Court granted an ex parte ad interim injunction in
favour of the Plaintiff, relevant part of which is as follows
Trial Court has vide the impugned order dated
30.11.2018, dismissed the interim injunction applications filed by the
Appellant under Order 39 Rules ... from the year 1975, Appellant was entitled to the grant of interim injunction
by the Trial Court. However, by the impugned order, applications under
Order
make out a prima facie case for grant of ad-interim
injunction. Furthermore, if I were to grant an injunction, as sought ... Further, it is a settled proposition of law that no interim injunction can be
granted where permanent injunction cannot be granted. Accordingly, this Court
rendition of accounts and costs.
9. An ex parte ad-interim injunction was granted by the Trial Court on
30.07.2016, restraining the Respondent ... justified and the Trial Court rightly
vacated the ex parte ad-interim injunction order. It was urged that:
(a) Appellant falsely represented that
rendition of accounts and costs.
9. An ex parte ad-interim injunction was granted by the Trial Court on
02.08.2016, restraining the Respondents in terms ... justified and the Trial Court
rightly vacated the ex parte ad-interim injunction order. It was urged that:
(a) Appellant falsely represented that
been preferred on behalf of the Plaintiff
seeking an order of interim injunction restraining the Defendants, their
Directors, assignees, etc., from playing the sound recordings ... Defendant No.1 takes a preliminary objection to the grant of interim
injunction on the ground that there is concealment and suppression of
material fact
vide order dated 10.02.2016, the Trial Court
granted ex-parte ad interim injunction in favour of the Appellants, restraining
the Respondent from using the trademark ... 003649
bearing on continuation or vacation of the ex-parte ad interim injunction
order.
10. It is further urged that the entire decision impugned herein
been filed on behalf of t h e Plaintiff seeking
interim injunction inter alia restraining the Defendants and their agents etc.,
from manufacturing, marketing, selling ... well as the common law rights,
Plaintiff is entitled to an interim injunction against Defendant No.1.
Assuming the statement of Defendant No.1 that
