document to prove that she had concealed the fact of her previous ailment
at the time of filling of the proposal form ... given his opinion that the insured was
suffering from previous ailments is lying blank in Ex. R-6 and even in the
reply and affidavit
claim was the suppression of material facts of the previous ailments.
As the claim was not honoured, the wife of the insured-deceased alleged deficiency ... obtains the insurance policy after suppressing the material facts or previous ailments, it goes to the root of the legitimacy of the contract
complainant is that the OPs just invented the excuse
of previous ailment of life assured and thereby rejected the
insurance claim of the complainants ... placed on the record, which is not sufficient to prove
any previous ailment of the life assured. The complainant relied upon
laid down
questions in the proposal form with regard to his previous ailment, the life-assured had suppressed the facts, which were material for him to disclose ... life assured did not give any misstatement. So far as previous ailments are concerned, the assured is not required to give details of all previous
crossing
the road without anybody help as he is suffering from previous
ailments and he has not sustained any injuries in the alleged
accident ... earlier
ailments and though he had taken treatment to his previous
ailments, only to claim compensation, he has stated that, he had
taken treatment
Priti Arora life assured concealed the material facts about her
above previous ailment at the time of getting the insurance policy
from the OP. Life ... when she took the insurance policy.
The non-disclosure of above previous ailment was a material fact for
issuance of policy
that Priti Arora life
assured concealed the material facts about her previous ailment at
the time of getting the insurance policy from the OP. Life ... patient, when she
took the insurance policy. The non-disclosure of previous ailment
was material fact for issuance of policy
crossexamination on behalf of petitioners, he
deposed that no previous ailment of deceased was discovered during
his investigation of the case. He further deposed ... here that
during his crossexamination, IO has deposed that no previous ailment of
deceased was discovered by him during investigation of the present case
time of admission and that doctor was examined to prove his previous ailment to justify the submission that wrong statement was made by the deceased
stated that he has not disclosed the fact of his pre-existing ailment of vomiting of blood in the proposal form and thereby breached ... specific questionnaire with regard to his state of health or previous ailments were fielded to him in the proposal form by OPs, but he replied
