petitioner is the
partner of the said Firm and the respondent was also a partner in the 1st petitioner
Firm. The respondent retired from ... capital to the partnership Firm and she was only a nominal
partner. Hence, there is no question of giving any share at the time
petitioner is the
partner of the said Firm and the respondent was also a partner in the 1st petitioner
Firm. The respondent retired from ... capital to the partnership Firm and she was only a nominal
partner. Hence, there is no question of giving any share at the time
partners of the
firm. It is to be noted that though all the partners including the
complainant were made parties to the complaint, the firm ... evidence to show that the first respondent
was the nominated partner of the firm so as to make him liable for the
cheque issued
managing partner. The learned
counsel for the revision petitioner fairly conceded
that neither the other partners nor any person was
nominated as manager ... conduct of the business. So long as there is
no nomination, managing partner can not
escape. In the above circumstance, the court below
designated partner i.e., Sachin
Bharath Khimji nominated as designated partner to Neo Alchemy Build India
LLP. ExD28consent letter by Guruprasad to appoint
issued against the co-accused other than the Company and the nominated person and the High Court would be justified in exercising its inherent jurisdiction ... business of the firm and no nomination in Form VIII is filed, the prosecution of such partner is illegal under the Prevention of Food Adulteration
Power deed it is seen that one of
the partner of the firm has nominated PW1 to empower him to act as a
general power
further states that the S.L. Daga, HUF was a partner of judgment debtor
No.1 and the Karta of the HUF was the said ... person nominated by the HUF
joins a partnership, the partnership will be between the
nominated person and the other partners of the firm.
Having regard
complaint spell out that the accused nos. 2 to 5 are the
partners and are responsible for stocking and sale of
adulterated
foodstuff and, therefore ... trial.
15. It is an admitted fact that any particular partner
was not nominated under Section 17 of the Prevention of
Food Adulteration
disposal. The respondents, a partnership firm, the specified nominated principal employer, the managing partner and working partner of the firm do not deserve
