Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 108 (1.24 seconds)

Maurya Films And Entertainments vs Athaansh Communications on 31 August, 2021

reliefs: "(a) Pass an order and injunction restraining the Respondent, its agents, servants, proprietor, representatives, executives, nominees, assignees, officers and/or any other person ... following reliefs: "(a) Pass an order and injunction restraining the Respondent, her agents, servants, nominees, assignees or any other person/s acting under, claiming

Ram Niwas vs Attar Singh & Ors on 16 November, 2011

right being a nominee of Jage Ram, the plaintiff having been recorded as his nominee would automatically become member of the society. Thus, the plaintiff ... rather he has filed the present suit seeking permanent injunction as well as mandatory injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing the plaintiff and directing them
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Order vs Dhiren Krishna Paul on 8 September, 2009

proceedings. Where there is probability of confusion in business, an injunction will be granted even though the defendants adopted the name innocently. Therefore, the learned ... counsel contended that if there is probability of confusion in business, an injunction will be granted even if the defendants have adopted the name innocently
Madras High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - K Chandru - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next