learned Tribunal ought to have directed the learned
Board of Nominees to decide the injunction application afresh but,
instead of taking such recourse, the learned ... aside with a direction to
the learned Board of Nominees to decide injunction application
afresh and pass appropriate reasoned and speaking order after
hearing both
before the
Board of Nominees wherein the injunction has been
granted in favour of the said Directors. Thus, there
was no reason to initiate ... further
submitted that though there was an injunction granted
by the Board of Nominees, the petitioners have
continued their disobedience of the order
against its byelaws. The
Board of Nominee has granted detailed interim injunction order
after perusing the documents produced at Mark ... Board
of Nominees. The Board of Nominees took into consideration the
primafacie case and the balance of convenience while granting the
injunction in favour
construction on the said plot. The Board of
Nominees rejected the application for injunction on
8/11/2004.
2.2 The order was challenged ... statement that since
the Board of Nominees had passed an order on the
application for injunction and a statutory remedy was
available, instead of prosecuting
application for recovery certificate before the
Board of Nominees and the Board of Nominees have issued certificate of
recovery and the present plaintiff has challenged ... order of the Registrar
of the Board of Nominees, but he has asked injunction, and the Registrar
of Cooperative Society has no power
void; for permanent
injunction restraining defendant Nos. 1 to 3 supplying the
winches through their agents, henchmen, workmen,
nominees, assignees and any other persons acting ... delivering the winches
to defendant Nos.5 and 6; and for mandatory injunction
directing defendant Nos. 1 to 3 to take deliveries of winches
from
deed in favour of
the plaintiffs or their nominees is as follows:
(i) Grant perpetual injunction, restraining the Defendants
and their henchmen, agents, servants ... execute the registered sale
deed in favour of the plaintiffs or their nominees or
assignees in respect of the A schedule property
vide order dated 29.5.2006 the learned Board of
Nominees has been pleased to grant interim injunction
restraining petitioner not to sell and / or cause ... itself contending to modify the order of injunction dated
29.5.2006 passed by the learned Board of Nominees and
permit the respondent to sale
preferred Lavad Case before the Board of Nominees
Court, wherein interim injunction is refused and not only
that but even cost of Rs.2500
filed by respondent No.1 for permanent
injunction for restraining the petitioners-defendants, their agents, nominees,
1 of 8
::: Downloaded
