Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 42283 (5.65 seconds)

Mahabir vs The State Of Haryana on 29 January, 2025

said Revision Petition, CRR-194-2006), due to non-payment of process fee. As on 12.07.2022 too, the appellants who were respondents in the revision ... said revision petition, CRR-194-2006, due to non-payment of process fee. 23. The order dated 12.07.2022 reflects that the appellants who were respondents
Supreme Court of India Cites 69 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M.Balaganesan vs P.Antony Amalraj

case under Section 204(4) of Cr.P.C., for non payment necessary process fee. Challenging the above dismissal judgment, the present revision came ... Negotiable Instruments Act came to be dismissed for non payment of process fee and this Court by referring to the decision of Kerala High
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next