Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 545 (8.05 seconds)

Improvement Trust, Barnala vs Ram Ditta on 26 March, 2012

provided. The respondent did not raise construction within the prescribed time and the demand of non-construction fee is legal and the respondent was liable ... nowhere provided that in the event of non- construction within the stipulated time, the non-construction fee will be charged. It has been held
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Improvement Trust Barnala, vs Sh. Prem Kumar on 7 April, 2014

complainant. He did not raise the construction within the stipulated period, therefore, the non-construction fee was taken from him, which was in accordance with ... that in case the construction was not completed within three years then he will be liable to pay non-construction fee. 7. Feeling aggrieved with
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Inder Pal Singla vs Dc, Barnala on 24 August, 2015

demanded Rs.9977/-, as compounding charges and Rs.27,840/-, as non-construction fee from the complainant, vide letter no.1542 dated 11.11.2011 issued ... Government Instructions, the allottee will have to pay non-construction fee. The complainant violated the terms and conditions of the said allotment letter, agreement
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next