Ram Karan vs Bhagwan Dass S/O Sh.Kishan Lal on 17 December, 2012
that the present suit is barred by time; it is bad for non-joinder of
parties; it has been undervalued and also that
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 200 (1.16 seconds)Smt. Savitri Devi ( Since Deceased) vs Shri Krishan Kumar on 15 May, 2012
jurisdiction to
adjudicated the present suit, that the suit is bad for non-joinder of
necessary parties, that Plaintiff failed to obtain succession certificate from ... plaintiffs.
52 Issue no. 3: Whether the suit is bad for non-joinder of
necessary parties? OPD
The defendant have taken a plea that
Sh.G.P.Singh vs Sh.Manish Kumar Sharma on 30 April, 2012
plaintiff.
35. Issue No.7
Whether suit is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties that is
the owner of the property Sh Lovi ... Lovi Pal
Singh but still the suit is not bad for non-joinder of Sh.Lovi Pal Singh
as the present suit has been filed
Sh.Jai Sigh vs Sh.Bahadur Singh Gahlot on 7 June, 2012
taking
preliminary objections that the suit of the plaintiff is bad for non-joinder
for necessary parties and is barred by the law of limitation ... Specific Relief Act and is further bad for non-joinder of
necessary parties. It was further his case that suit is barred by limitation
Sh. Bakshi Ram vs Sh. Kishan on 28 April, 2012
duly authorised person
and further that suit is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties. It
was stated that alleged mortgage deed dated ... non-joinder of
necessary parties?OPD:- Under issue No. 3 the Ld. Trial court has
observed that suit is bad for non-joinder of necessary
Suit No:06/08/1996 vs N.D.M.C Through on 21 January, 2012
defendant and vice-versa (party
wrongfully impleaded). However, 'Non-joinder' refers to a situation when
a party who ought to have been impleaded ... case of misjoinder. Non-joinder of parties
is not fatal to a suit. However, a distinction between non-joinder of
someone who ought to have
Civil Judge vs Delhi Wakf Board on 7 November, 2012
dismissed.
ii) That the suit is bad for misjoinder and non-joinder of
parties.
14 On merits, defendant no. 7 has denied all the
allegations ... following
issues:-
1. Whether the suit is bad for mis-joinder and non-joinder of
parties? OPD
2. Whether the pltffs
Shri Chitter Singh vs Sh. Hari Singh on 17 January, 2012
plaintiff in his
individual capacity, is bad for non-joinder as well as mis-joinder of the
parties.
24. No doubt that the case ... only
on the ground of non-joinder and mis-joinder of parties, but in the instant
case the objections regarding non-joinder were taken
Delhi vs Sh. Jai Ram Sharma on 10 January, 2012
suppressed material facts? OPD
2. Whether the suit is bad for non-joinder of parties? OPD
3. Whether plaintiff is entitled to decree of partition ... non-joinder of parties? OPD
The onus of proving this issue was upon the defendant. Defendant states that
the suit is bad for non-joinder
M/S Bansal Trading Corporation vs Sh. Pravin Mehta on 28 September, 2012
non-joinder and
mis-joinder of parties? OPD
The defendant has taken a plea that suit is bad for non-
joinder and mis-joinder ... been impleaded due to which
suit is bad for mis-joinder or non-joinder of the necessary parties. The
defendant has thus failed to discharge