Manish Daryani vs Central Board Of Direct Taxes on 18 August, 2023
based on the strength of fake tax
invoices issued by nonexistent entity based in Chhattisgarh, thereby raising
the necessary inference that these entities in Chhattisgarh
Search Results Page
Search Results
41 - 50 of 570 (0.48 seconds)Shashi Kumar Sharma vs . Sunder Singh & Another. on 5 August, 2022
aforesaid circumstances, it has been
submitted that being a nonexistent entity, it would not be
possible to serve Delhi Cloth Mills and further that respondent
Rajgor Premshankar Asharam vs Adani Kalptaru Power Limited on 23 August, 2021
respondent No.2
submits that the respondent No.2 is nonexistent entity.
Mr. Mulani, learned advocate for the petitioner
seeks time to receive instructions
Acit Circle 1(2)(1) , Mumbai vs M B Patil Construction Limited , Mumbai on 16 April, 2024
Spice, the final order only referred to the name of nonexistent
entity without any reference to the amalgamated company;
(e) Even as per decision ... order passed by the TPO in the name of SPIL, a nonexistent
entity was invalid in the eyes of the law;
f) SPIL ceased
M/S M.B.Patil Constructions Limited, ... vs Income Tax Department, National ... on 16 April, 2024
Spice, the final order only referred to the name of nonexistent
entity without any reference to the amalgamated company;
(e) Even as per decision ... order passed by the TPO in the name of SPIL, a nonexistent
entity was invalid in the eyes of the law;
f) SPIL ceased
Marvel Realtors & Developers Ltd vs Commisioner Central Excise And Service ... on 18 October, 2022
called M/s. Marvel Realtors. Thus, a
notice issued to a nonexisting person cannot be considered to be
commencement of any inquiry or an investigation ... been issued to M/s. Marvel Realtors, which admittedly
is a nonexisting entity. Therefore, no proceedings have been
initiated against the two respondents herein
Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax- ... vs Foodlink Services India Pvt Ltd, Mumbai on 30 January, 2025
made any inquiries to
establish that the investment was from a nonexistent entity. No
have been brought on record to indicate that the
evidences have
Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax- ... vs Foodlink Services India Pvt Ltd, Mumbai on 30 January, 2025
made any inquiries to
establish that the investment was from a nonexistent entity. No
have been brought on record to indicate that the
evidences have
Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax- ... vs Foodlink Services India Pvt Ltd, Mumbai on 30 January, 2025
made any inquiries to
establish that the investment was from a nonexistent entity. No
have been brought on record to indicate that the
evidences have
Capgemini Technology Sevices India ... vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income ... on 26 March, 2025
name of AIPL- which was a nonexistent
entity. Further, the assessee filed submission dated 31 March 2021 before the
NEAC, Delhi i.e. the Assessing ... Order and the draft assessment order in the
name of a nonexistent entity. In our view, the view of the Courts and Tribunals on
this